Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
To Disclose or Not to Disclose: A Multi-stakeholder Focus Group Study on Mental Health Issues in the Work Environment.
Brouwers, E P M; Joosen, M C W; van Zelst, C; Van Weeghel, J.
Afiliação
  • Brouwers EPM; Department Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, NETHLAB, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands. e.p.m.brouwers@tilburguniversity.edu.
  • Joosen MCW; Department Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, NETHLAB, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • van Zelst C; Department Human Resource Studies, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, NETHLAB, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Van Weeghel J; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Occup Rehabil ; 30(1): 84-92, 2020 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31410722
Purpose Whether or not to disclose mental illness or mental health issues in the work environment is a highly sensitive dilemma. It can facilitate keeping or finding paid employment, but can also lead to losing employment or to not being hired, because of discrimination and stigma. Research questions were: (1) what do stakeholders see as advantages and disadvantages of disclosing mental illness or mental health issues in the work environment?; (2) what factors are of influence on a positive outcome of disclosure? Methods A focus group study was conducted with five different stakeholder groups: people with mental illness, Human Resources professionals, employers, work reintegration professionals, and mental health advocates. Sessions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. Thematic content analysis was performed by two researchers using AtlasTi-7.5. Results were visually represented in a diagram to form a theoretical model. Results Concerning (dis-)advantages of disclosure, six themes emerged as advantages (improved relationships, authenticity, work environment support, friendly culture) and two as disadvantages (discrimination and stigma). Of influence on the disclosure outcome were: Aspects of the disclosure process, workplace factors, financial factors, and employee factors. Stakeholders generally agreed, although distinct differences were also found and discussed in the paper. Conclusion As shown from the theoretical model, the (non-)disclosure process is complex, and the outcome is influenced by many factors, most of which cannot be influenced by the individual with mental illness. However, the theme 'Aspects of the disclosure process', including subthemes: who to disclose to, timing, preparation, message content and communication style is promising for improving work participation of people with mental illness or mental health issues, because disclosers can positively influence these aspects themselves.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Local de Trabalho / Revelação / Discriminação Psicológica / Emprego / Estigma Social / Transtornos Mentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Occup Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Local de Trabalho / Revelação / Discriminação Psicológica / Emprego / Estigma Social / Transtornos Mentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Occup Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Holanda