Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Work-Related Medical Rehabilitation in Cancer: A Cluster-Randomized Multicenter Study.
Fauser, David; Wienert, Julian; Zomorodbakhsch, Bijan; Schmielau, Jan; Biester, Irene; Krüger, Hans-Ulrich; Presl, Angelika; Bethge, Matthias.
Afiliação
  • Fauser D; Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck; Department of Psychology & Methods, University of Bremen; Paracelsus-Klinik am See, Bad Gandersheim; AMEOS Reha Klinikum, Ratzeburg; MediClin Rose Klinik, Horn-Bad Meinberg; Klinik Bavaria, Freyung.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 116(35-36): 592-599, 2019 09 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31587707
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend rehabilitative measures to alleviate dis- turbances resulting from cancer and its treatment. To give cancer survivors further assistance in getting back to work, work-related medical rehabilitation is currently being tested in Germany. In this cluster-randomized, multicenter trial, we studied the efficacy of work-related medical rehabilitation compared with conventional medical rehabilitation (trial no. DRKS00007770 in the German Clinical Trials Registry). METHODS: A total of 484 cancer survivors of working age who were candidates for rehabilitation were recruited and assigned at random to either the intervention group (IG; work-related medical rehabilitation) or the control group (CG). The primary end- point was self-assessed function in a role one year after the end of rehabilitation, as evaluated with the health-related quality of life questionnaire of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30). Further endpoints included symptom and function scales, subjective ability to work, coping with illness, and return to work. Neither the medical personnel nor the subjects were blinded. RESULTS: One year after the end of rehabilitation, data from 379 subjects who par- ticipated in the last follow-up survey were evaluated. The intervention and control groups did not differ significantly either in the primary endpoint of role function (IG = 60.8 vs. CG = 57.6 out of a maximum of 100 points; p = 0.204) or in any of the secondary endpoints. A last observation carried forward analysis yielded com- parable results. At 12 months, 28.5% of the subjects in the IG and 25.3% of those in the CG were still unable to work. CONCLUSION: This study did not reveal any significant clinically relevant advantage of work-related medical rehabilitation at one year. Future studies should determine whether a second period of rehabilitation might be helpful and whether selected subjects might benefit from the assistance of case managers beyond the period of rehabilitation.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reabilitação Vocacional / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Dtsch Arztebl Int Assunto da revista: MEDICINA / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reabilitação Vocacional / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Dtsch Arztebl Int Assunto da revista: MEDICINA / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Alemanha