Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical effectiveness of denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab, and teriparatide for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Simpson, E L; Martyn-St James, Marrissa; Hamilton, Jean; Wong, Ruth; Gittoes, Neil; Selby, Peter; Davis, Sarah.
Afiliação
  • Simpson EL; University of Sheffield, United Kingdom. Electronic address: e.l.simpson@sheffield.ac.uk.
  • Martyn-St James M; University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  • Hamilton J; University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  • Wong R; University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  • Gittoes N; University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  • Selby P; University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  • Davis S; University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Bone ; 130: 115081, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31626995
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To determine the clinical effectiveness of denosumab (DEN), raloxifene (RLX), romosozumab (ROMO) and teriparatide (TPTD), within their licensed (or anticipated licensed) indications, for the treatment of osteoporosis.

METHODS:

A systematic review was conducted. Nine electronic databases and trial registries were searched up to the end of July 2018. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were randomised controlled trials (RCT) in a population at risk of osteoporotic fracture, comparing these four non-bisphosphonates DEN, RLX, ROMO, or TPTD with each other, a non-active treatment, or the bisphosphonates alendronate (ALN), risedronate (RIS), ibandronate (IBN) and zoledronic acid (ZOL). Quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Network meta-analyses (NMA) were used to determine the relative effectiveness of treatments.

RESULTS:

The systematic review identified 7898 citations. Forty-six RCTs of non-bisphosphonates met the inclusion criteria for the review and provided data for analyses. Additionally 49 RCTs of bisphosphonates were used in the NMAs. Forty-six RCTs were included in the NMA of vertebral fracture data, 23 RCTs for hip fractures and 73 RCTs in the NMA of femoral neck bone mineral density (FN BMD). For vertebral fractures, all four non-bisphosphonates showed statistically significant benefit relative to placebo TPTD HR 0.23 (95% credible internal (CrI) 0.16, 0.32); ROMO followed by ALN 0.25 (95% CrI 0.15, 0.43); DEN HR 0.30 (95% CrI 0.21, 0.43); RLX HR 0.61 (95% CrI 0.44, 0.80). The four non-bisphosphonates interventions studied also showed statistically significant benefit relative to placebo for FN BMD, and for hip fractures TPTD, ROMO followed by ALN, and DEN showed statistically significant benefit relative to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS:

The four non-bisphosphonate interventions studied were all statistically significantly clinically effective for reducing vertebral fractures when compared to placebo, and were beneficial for change in FN BMD compared to placebo. All reduced hip fractures, and this was statistically significant for TPTD, ROMO followed by ALN, and DEN.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conservadores da Densidade Óssea / Fraturas por Osteoporose Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Bone Assunto da revista: METABOLISMO / ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conservadores da Densidade Óssea / Fraturas por Osteoporose Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Bone Assunto da revista: METABOLISMO / ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article