Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do combination HIV prevention programmes result in increased empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights for marginalised populations in low-income and middle-income countries? A systematic review.
Brody, Carinne; Sok, Say; Tuot, Sovannary; Pantelic, Marija; Restoy, Enrique; Yi, Siyan.
Afiliação
  • Brody C; Center for Global Health Research, Touro University California, Vallejo, California, USA.
  • Sok S; KHANA Center for Population Health Research, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  • Tuot S; KHANA Center for Population Health Research, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  • Pantelic M; Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
  • Restoy E; Frontline AIDS, Brighton, UK.
  • Yi S; Department of Medical Education, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
BMJ Glob Health ; 4(5): e001560, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31673432
INTRODUCTION: This systematic review aims to determine if combination HIV prevention programmes include outcome measures for empowerment, inclusion and agency to demand equal rights and measure the relationship between empowerment and HIV prevention outcomes. METHODS: An electronic literature search of PubMed, POPLINE, Index Medicus and Google Scholar was conducted between August and October 2018. We included studies that evaluated combination prevention programmes that had all three types of intervention components and that specifically serve members of populations disproportionately affected by HIV published from 2008 to 2018. The selected studies were screened for inclusion, and relevant data abstracted, assessed for bias and synthesised. RESULTS: This review included a total of 15 studies. Findings indicate that combination HIV prevention programmes for marginalised populations have delivered a variety of theory-based behavioural and structural interventions that support improvements in empowerment, inclusion and agency. However, empowerment, inclusion and least of all agency are not measured consistently or in a standardised way. In addition, analysis of their relationships with HIV prevention outcomes is rare. Out of our 15 included studies, only two measured a relationship between an empowerment, inclusion or agency outcome and an HIV prevention outcome. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that policy-makers, programme planners and researchers might need to consider the intermediate steps on the pathway to increased condom use and HIV testing so as to explain the 'how' of their achievements and inform future investments in HIV prevention. This will support replication and expansion of programmes and ensure sustainability of the programmes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018106909.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Glob Health Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Glob Health Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Reino Unido