Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic Review on the Content of Outcome Measurement Instruments on Scar Quality.
Carrière, Michelle E; Kwa, Kelly A A; de Haas, Louise E M; Pijpe, Anouk; Tyack, Zephanie; Ket, Johannes C F; van Zuijlen, Paul P M; de Vet, Henrica C W; Mokkink, Lidwine B.
Afiliação
  • Carrière ME; Burn Center and Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
  • Kwa KAA; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • de Haas LEM; Association of Dutch Burn Centers, Beverwijk, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
  • Pijpe A; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
  • Tyack Z; Burn Center and Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
  • Ket JCF; Department of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • van Zuijlen PPM; Burn Center and Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
  • de Vet HCW; Burn Center and Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands.
  • Mokkink LB; Centre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Child Health Research Centre, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 7(9): e2424, 2019 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31741815
ABSTRACT
Measurements of scar quality are essential to evaluate the effectiveness of scar treatments and to monitor scars. A large number of scar scales and measurement devices have been developed, which makes instrument selection challenging. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the content (ie, included items) of all outcome measurement instruments that measure scar quality in different types of scars (burn, surgical, keloid, and necrotizing fasciitis), and the frequency at which the instruments and included items are used.

METHODS:

A systematic search was performed in PubMed and Embase.com up to October 31, 2018. All original studies reporting on instruments that measured at least 1 characteristic of scar quality were included and the instrument's content was extracted.

RESULTS:

We included 440 studies for data extraction. Included instruments (N = 909) were clinician-reported scales (41%), measurement devices (30%), patient-reported scales (26%), and combined clinician- and patient-reported scales (3%). The Observer scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, the Cutometer, the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and the modified Vancouver Scar Scale were the most often used instrument in each of these categories, respectively. The most frequent assessed items were thickness, vascularity, pigmentation, pliability, pain, and itch.

CONCLUSION:

The results of this study lay the foundation for our future research, which includes an international Delphi study among many scar experts, and an international focus group study among scar patients, aiming to elucidate how scar quality must be defined and measured from both professional and patient perspectives.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda
...