Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intramedullary Nailing Versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Distal Tibial Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Liu, Xiao-Kai; Xu, Wen-Nan; Xue, Qing-Yun; Liang, Qing-Wei.
Afiliação
  • Liu XK; Joint Surgery Department, Chaoyang Central Hospital, Chaoyang City, Liaoning Province, China.
  • Xu WN; Department of Orthopaedic, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
  • Xue QY; Department of Orthopaedic, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
  • Liang QW; Department of Orthopaedic, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China.
Orthop Surg ; 11(6): 954-965, 2019 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31823496
ABSTRACT
To evaluate the application, safety and efficacy of the patients treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in distal tibia fractures. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched databases PubMed, Cochrane library, EMBASE and Web of Science from inception of the database up to 10 October 2018, using the keywords "distal tibia fractures", "plate", "intramedullary nailing" and "RCT" to identify randomized clinical trials about distal tibia fractures. The included studies were assessed by two researchers according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias criteria. The primary outcome of measurement included operation time, malunion rate, nonunion/delayed union rate, and wound complication. Data analysis was conducted with Review Manager 5.3 software. A total of 10 RCTs involving 911 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria with 455 patients in the IMN group and 456 patients in the MIPO group. There were no significant differences in radiation time, nonunion or delayed union rate, union time and operation time between the two groups. Patients treated with MIPO had lower incidence of malunion compared with IMN (RR = 1.85, 95%CI 1.21 to 2.83, P = 1.00), while IMN seemed to have lower surgical incision complications whether in closed or opening fractures (RR = 0.49, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.73, P = 0.43). But in patients classified as 43A, the result of subgroup analysis suggested that there was no significant inwound complication between the two groups. MIPO was superior in preventing malunion compared with IMN, and intramedullary nailing appeared to have lower wound complications. However, in patients with 43A distal tibial fractures, MIPO was more recommended for its prevention of malunion. No matter which method we choose, we should notice and prevent the associated complications.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas da Tíbia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos / Fixação Interna de Fraturas / Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Orthop Surg Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas da Tíbia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos / Fixação Interna de Fraturas / Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Orthop Surg Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China