Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability of self-reported smoking history and its implications for lung cancer screening.
Volk, Robert J; Mendoza, Tito R; Hoover, Diana S; Nishi, Shawn P E; Choi, Noah J; Bevers, Therese B.
Afiliação
  • Volk RJ; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1444, Houston, TX 77230, USA.
  • Mendoza TR; Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1450, Houston, TX 77230, USA.
  • Hoover DS; Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1440, Houston, TX 77230, USA.
  • Nishi SPE; Department of Internal Medicine, UTMB Health Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555-0561, USA.
  • Choi NJ; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1444, Houston, TX 77230, USA.
  • Bevers TB; Rice University, 6100 Main St, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Prev Med Rep ; 17: 101037, 2020 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31934536
ABSTRACT
Clinical guidelines endorse either a 30 or 20 pack-year smoking history threshold when determining eligibility for lung cancer screening (LCS). However, self-reported smoking history is subject to recall bias that can affect patient eligibility. We examined the reliability of smokers' self-reported tobacco use and its impact on eligibility for LCS. Current or former smokers aged 55-77 years completed questionnaires requesting demographic information and smoking history. Data were collected between December 2014 and September 2015. Total pack-year smoking history was calculated for each participant based on their responses at baseline and one month later. One hundred and two participants completed the study (mean age = 63.6 years). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the pack-year estimate was 0.93. For the 30 pack-year threshold, eight (7.8%) participants were eligible at one but not both assessment periods. For the 20 pack-year threshold, twelve participants (11.8%) were eligible at one but not both assessment periods. Inconsistent reporting was higher among current compared to former smokers. Smokers' self-reported tobacco use appears highly reliable over short time periods. Nevertheless, there is some inconsistent reporting. We recommend that clinicians carefully assess smoking history, probe patients' recall of duration and quantity of smoking, and collect tobacco use information at every encounter.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Rep Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Rep Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos