Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of presurgical interventions on chronic pain after total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Dennis, Jane; Wylde, Vikki; Gooberman-Hill, Rachael; Blom, A W; Beswick, Andrew David.
Afiliação
  • Dennis J; Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK jane.dennis@bristol.ac.uk.
  • Wylde V; Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Gooberman-Hill R; National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Blom AW; Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Beswick AD; National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BMJ Open ; 10(1): e033248, 2020 01 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31964670
OBJECTIVE: Nearly 100 000 primary total knee replacements (TKR) are performed in the UK annually. The primary aim of TKR is pain relief, but 10%-34% of patients report chronic pain. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of presurgical interventions in preventing chronic pain after TKR. DESIGN: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library and PsycINFO were searched from inception to December 2018. Screening and data extraction were performed by two authors. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool and quality of evidence was assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Pain at 6 months or longer; adverse events. INTERVENTIONS: Presurgical interventions aimed at improving TKR outcomes. RESULTS: Eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with data from 960 participants were included. The studies involved nine eligible comparisons. We found moderate-quality evidence of no effect of exercise programmes on chronic pain after TKR, based on a meta-analysis of 6 interventions with 229 participants (standardised mean difference 0.20, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.47, I2=0%). Sensitivity analysis restricted to studies at overall low risk of bias confirmed findings. Another RCT of exercise with no data available for meta-analysis showed no benefit. Studies evaluating combined exercise and education intervention (n=1) and education alone (n=1) suggested similar findings. Adverse event data were reported by most studies, but events were too few to draw conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: We found low to moderate-quality evidence to suggest that neither preoperative exercise, education nor a combination of both is effective in preventing chronic pain after TKR. This review also identified a lack of evaluations of other preoperative interventions, such as multimodal pain management, which may improve long-term pain outcomes after TKR. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017041382.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Cuidados Pré-Operatórios / Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Artroplastia do Joelho / Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Cuidados Pré-Operatórios / Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Artroplastia do Joelho / Dor Crônica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido