Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of background lung characteristics on nodule detection with computed tomography.
Li, Boning; Smith, Taylor B; Choudhury, Kingshuk R; Harrawood, Brian; Ebner, Lukas; Roos, Justus E; Rubin, Geoffrey D.
Afiliação
  • Li B; Rice University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Smith TB; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
  • Choudhury KR; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
  • Harrawood B; Duke University, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
  • Ebner L; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
  • Roos JE; Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, Department of Radiology, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Rubin GD; Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Department of Radiology, Luzern, Switzerland.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham) ; 7(2): 022409, 2020 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32016136
ABSTRACT
We sought to characterize local lung complexity in chest computed tomography (CT) and to characterize its impact on the detectability of pulmonary nodules. Forty volumetric chest CT scans were created by embedding between three and five simulated 5-mm lung nodules into one of three volumetric chest CT datasets. Thirteen radiologists evaluated 157 nodules, resulting in 2041 detection opportunities. Analyzing the substrate CT data prior to nodule insertion, 14 image features were measured within a region around each nodule location. A generalized linear mixed-effects statistical model was fit to the data to verify the contribution of each metric on detectability. The model was tuned for simplicity, interpretability, and generalizability using stepwise regression applied to the primary features and their interactions. We found that variables corresponding to each of five categories (local structural distractors, local intensity, global context, local vascularity, and contiguity with structural distractors) were significant ( p < 0.01 ) factors in a standardized model. Moreover, reader-specific models conveyed significant differences among readers with significant distraction (missed detections) influenced by local intensity- versus local-structural characteristics being mutually exclusive. Readers with significant local intensity distraction ( n = 10 ) detected substantially fewer lung nodules than those who were significantly distracted by local structure ( n = 2 ), 46.1% versus 65.3% mean nodules detected, respectively.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos