Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment Switch Patterns and Healthcare Costs in Biologic-Naive Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.
Wu, Jashin J; Pelletier, Corey; Ung, Brian; Tian, Marc; Khilfeh, Ibrahim; Curtis, Jeffrey R.
Afiliação
  • Wu JJ; Dermatology Research and Education Foundation, Irvine, CA, USA.
  • Pelletier C; Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ, 07901, USA. cpelletier@celgene.com.
  • Ung B; Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ, 07901, USA.
  • Tian M; Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ, 07901, USA.
  • Khilfeh I; Celgene Corporation, 86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ, 07901, USA.
  • Curtis JR; University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Avenue S, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Adv Ther ; 37(5): 2098-2115, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32141018
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects an estimated 30% of psoriasis patients who use systemic therapy. Symptoms of PsA, such as joint swelling and tenderness, can be painful and disabling and may worsen quality of life. PsA can also impart a substantial economic burden. Treatment for moderate to severe PsA often involves the use of systemic oral medications (e.g., conventional systemic treatments such as methotrexate or targeted systemic treatments such as apremilast) or biologic therapy given by injection or infusion. Because PsA symptoms and responses to treatment can vary, patients may switch treatments over time. More research is needed to better understand how switching treatments affects healthcare costs among patients starting treatment with apremilast or a biologic for PsA. This study compared treatment switching and healthcare costs among patients with PsA who had never been treated with a biologic and who started treatment with apremilast or a biologic for PsA. Rates of treatment switching at 12 months were similar for patients starting treatment with apremilast versus those starting a biologic. Patients starting treatment with apremilast had significantly lower total healthcare costs compared with those starting a biologic, even if they later switched to a biologic. Healthcare costs calculated per patient per month (PPPM) were also lower with apremilast versus biologics, driven by lower PPPM pharmacy costs. These findings suggest that starting treatment with apremilast may be an effective and cost-effective strategy for managing PsA, even for patients who later switch to a biologic.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Talidomida / Produtos Biológicos / Artrite Psoriásica / Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Adv Ther Assunto da revista: TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Talidomida / Produtos Biológicos / Artrite Psoriásica / Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Adv Ther Assunto da revista: TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos