Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incorporating Participant and Clinical Feedback into a Community-Based Participatory Research Study of Colorectal Cancer Among Alaska Native People.
Nash, Sarah H; Greenley, Rochelle; Dietz-Chavez, Daniela; Vindigni, Stephen; Harrison, Tabitha; Peters, Ulrike; Redwood, Diana.
Afiliação
  • Nash SH; Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, 3900 Ambassador Drive, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA. shnash@anthc.org.
  • Greenley R; Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, 3900 Ambassador Drive, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA.
  • Dietz-Chavez D; Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, 3900 Ambassador Drive, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA.
  • Vindigni S; Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, 3900 Ambassador Drive, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA.
  • Harrison T; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Peters U; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Redwood D; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Community Health ; 45(4): 803-811, 2020 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32144608
ABSTRACT
Alaska Native (AN) people have among the highest rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) globally. We are developing a community-based participatory research (CBPR) informed program to understand risk and protective factors contributing to these high rates. In 2018, we conducted a pilot study to test feasibility of recruiting participants from the Alaska Native Medical Center CRC Screening Clinic into a prospective epidemiologic study. Post-pilot study completion, we conducted focus groups (n = 2) with participants and key informant interviews (n = 7) with research and clinical staff to understand study experiences. During 106 days of recruitment, 30 participants enrolled in the pilot study. Over half (60%) were female, and most (67%) were aged 40-59 years. Key themes that emerged from the participant focus groups were the desire to contribute to improving the health of AN people as a key driver of participation; an overall positive experience with the study; the benefit of clinical staff notifying patients about the study; the need to clearly explain the purpose of each biospecimen collected; barriers to participation; and, the importance of returning study results to the community. Key themes from research and clinical staff interviews included the study not interfering with clinical duties; the importance of relationships between clinical and research staff; the importance of research staff flexibility; and, comments on specific study procedures. As part of the CBPR process, this feedback will be incorporated into study protocols. We are building this pilot work into a larger prospective study that will inform primary prevention programs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Community Health Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Community Health Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos