Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Budgeting for Environmental Health Services in Healthcare Facilities: A Ten-Step Model for Planning and Costing.
Anderson, Darcy M; Cronk, Ryan; Best, Lucy; Radin, Mark; Schram, Hayley; Tracy, J Wren; Bartram, Jamie.
Afiliação
  • Anderson DM; The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Cronk R; The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Best L; The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Radin M; The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Schram H; The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Tracy JW; The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Bartram J; The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32245057
Environmental health services (EHS) in healthcare facilities (HCFs) are critical for safe care provision, yet their availability in low- and middle-income countries is low. A poor understanding of costs hinders progress towards adequate provision. Methods are inconsistent and poorly documented in costing literature, suggesting opportunities to improve evidence. The goal of this research was to develop a model to guide budgeting for EHS in HCFs. Based on 47 studies selected through a systematic review, we identified discrete budgeting steps, developed codes to define each step, and ordered steps into a model. We identified good practices based on a review of additional selected guidelines for costing EHS and HCFs. Our model comprises ten steps in three phases: planning, data collection, and synthesis. Costing-stakeholders define the costing purpose, relevant EHS, and cost scope; assess the EHS delivery context; develop a costing plan; and identify data sources (planning). Stakeholders then execute their costing plan and evaluate the data quality (data collection). Finally, stakeholders calculate costs and disseminate findings (synthesis). We present three hypothetical costing examples and discuss good practices, including using costing frameworks, selecting appropriate indicators to measure the quantity and quality of EHS, and iterating planning and data collection to select appropriate costing approaches and identify data gaps.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Ambiental / Instalações de Saúde / Serviços de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Ambiental / Instalações de Saúde / Serviços de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Suíça