Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cross-sectional Analysis of Emergency Department and Acute Care Utilization Among Medicare Beneficiaries.
Venkatesh, Arjun K; Mei, Hao; Shuling, Liu; D'Onofrio, Gail; Rothenberg, Craig; Lin, Zhenqiu; Krumholz, Harlan M.
Afiliação
  • Venkatesh AK; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Mei H; Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, CT.
  • Shuling L; Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, CT.
  • D'Onofrio G; Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.
  • Rothenberg C; Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, CT.
  • Lin Z; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
  • Krumholz HM; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Acad Emerg Med ; 27(7): 570-579, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32302034
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We sought to develop a claims-based definition of unscheduled care to describe the use and role of the emergency department (ED) in providing unscheduled care to vulnerable older adult populations.

METHODS:

This study was a cross-sectional analysis of national 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries included in the 2012 Chronic Condition Warehouse data set. We measured three

outcomes:

the number of ED visits per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries, the proportion of all unscheduled ED and office-based visits occurring in the ED and the number of ED and non-ED unscheduled visits adjusting for risk factors. Each outcome was estimated for vulnerable subpopulations of Medicare beneficiaries with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs), dual eligibility, hospice enrollment, and skilled nursing facility use.

RESULTS:

A total of 10,717,786 Medicare beneficiaries were included with 33,696,461 potentially unscheduled care visits of which 5,192,235 (15%) occurred in the ED, 364,334 (1.1%) in facility-based urgent care, and 31,570,113 (84%) in ambulatory office settings. In regression analyses each subpopulation was more likely to visit the ED for unscheduled care services than the reference population of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 to 80. Dual-eligible beneficiaries demonstrated higher ED visit rates and lower non-ED visit rates for unscheduled care. The subpopulation with MCCs uses both the ED and the non-ED setting for unscheduled care more so than any other group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Medicare beneficiaries, particularly vulnerable subpopulations, disproportionately visit the ED in comparison to physician offices for unscheduled care. Efforts to improve care coordination, measure quality, or reform payment to influence ED visitation should acknowledge these patterns and the unique availability of acute care services in the ED.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicare / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Acad Emerg Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicare / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Acad Emerg Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article