Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass.
Aleman, Rene; Lo Menzo, Emanuele; Szomstein, Samuel; Rosenthal, Raul J.
Afiliação
  • Aleman R; Department of General Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
  • Lo Menzo E; Department of General Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
  • Szomstein S; Department of General Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
  • Rosenthal RJ; Department of General Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
Ann Transl Med ; 8(Suppl 1): S7, 2020 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32309411
ABSTRACT
The single-anastomosis gastric bypass has been proposed as a simpler and efficient weight loss reducing surgery. Postoperative outcomes are comparable to those of contemporary popular procedures. There are, however, controversies regarding the efficiency and risks of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). The purpose of this review is to define the role of OAGB in metabolic surgery via its operative outcomes. A review of English language literature was performed using the PubMed database, basing the search on the following keywords "one-anastomosis gastric bypass" AND "outcomes". A total of 238 articles were considered for review. Following thorough screening and selection criteria, 7 articles were considered sufficient for assessment. The nature of the available evidence of this technique poses a challenge to OAGB in its establishment as a standard of care procedure. The anatomical configuration following surgery, as well as the metabolic implications of its hypo-absorptive nature, raises controversial and ongoing concerns that are yet to be addressed. Hence, prospective studies with long-term follow-up (>5 years) can bypass these concerns and allow the progression of the clinical practice of OAGB.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ann Transl Med Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Ann Transl Med Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos