Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of protective gloves by hairdressers: A review of efficacy and potential adverse effects.
Havmose, Martin; Thyssen, Jacob P; Zachariae, Claus; Johansen, Jeanne D.
Afiliação
  • Havmose M; National Allergy Research Center, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
  • Thyssen JP; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
  • Zachariae C; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
  • Johansen JD; National Allergy Research Center, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
Contact Dermatitis ; 83(2): 75-82, 2020 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32311093
ABSTRACT
Occupational hand eczema is common among hairdressers, and protective gloves are important in limiting exposure to irritants and allergens. Various glove types may differ in their protective ability, and their use may lead to hand eczema due to skin irritancy and allergy. MEDLINE was searched for studies investigating permeation of gloves to irritants and allergens used in the hairdressing trade, as well as adverse effects of glove use affecting hairdressers. Forty-four studies were identified; nine reported on permeation. Of those, two in vitro studies found nitrile rubber (NR) gloves to give the best protection when handling hair dyes. Polyethylene (PE) gloves had the lowest reported break-through time. The prevalence of sensitization to rubber materials in European hairdressers was as follows thiuram mix, median 2.5% (range 0%-8.2%), weighted average 3.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0%-3.1%); mercapto mix, median 0.4% (range 0%-3.3%), weighted average 0.5% (95% CI 0.47%-0.50%), mercaptobenzothiazole, median 0.6% (range 0%-6.6%), weighted average 0.7% (95% CI 0.6%-0.7%), NRL-type I allergy, median 1.3% (range 1%-16.4%), weighted average 4.0% (95% CI 3.6%-4.5%). In conclusion, NR gloves provide the best skin protection for hairdressers, although natural rubber latex (NRL) and polyvinylchloride (PVC) gloves may be sufficient in most cases. PE gloves are not recommended. Synthetic rubber gloves with low or no levels of accelerators are preferred.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Barbearia / Exposição Ocupacional / Luvas Protetoras / Tinturas para Cabelo Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Contact Dermatitis Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Barbearia / Exposição Ocupacional / Luvas Protetoras / Tinturas para Cabelo Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Contact Dermatitis Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca