Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk of Recurrence After Treatment for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 3 and Adenocarcinoma In Situ of the Cervix: Recurrence of CIN 3 and AIS of Cervix.
Swift, Brenna E; Wang, Li; Jembere, Nathaniel; Kupets, Rachel.
Afiliação
  • Swift BE; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Wang L; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Jembere N; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 24(3): 252-258, 2020 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32384365
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate recurrence risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3+ and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)+ in a large population cohort of women previously treated for CIN 3/AIS. METHODS: Merging administrative databases with information on health services utilization and jurisdictional cancer registry, we identified all women undergoing treatment for CIN 3 or AIS from 2006 to 2010. Recurrence rate 1-5 years after treatment was defined as a biopsy finding of CIN 3/AIS or retreatment (loop electrosurgical excision procedure [LEEP], laser, cone, hysterectomy). Logistic regression was used to determine odds of recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 15,177 women underwent treatment for CIN 3 (n = 14,668) and AIS (n = 509). The recurrence rate for 5 years was greater for AIS (9.0%) compared with CIN 3 (6.1%). In a multivariate analysis, increased risk of recurrence was shown for age older than 45 years (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.1-1.6), AIS compared with CIN 3 (HR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.5-3.5) first cytology after treatment showing high grade (HR = 12.4, 95% CI = 9.7-15.7), and no normal Pap smears after treatment (HR = 2.8, 95% CI = 2.2-3.7). There was no difference in recurrence risk with treatment type (cone vs LEEP: HR = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.8-1.2, and laser vs LEEP: HR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.8-1.4) or number of procedures per year performed by physicians (<40 vs >40 procedures: HR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.9-1.3). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence risk of CIN 3 and AIS is related to age, histology, and posttreatment cytology, which should assist with discharge planning from colposcopy. Definitive treatment with hysterectomy should be considered in women older than 45 years with additional risk factors for recurrence.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Displasia do Colo do Útero / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Adenocarcinoma in Situ / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Low Genit Tract Dis Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Displasia do Colo do Útero / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Adenocarcinoma in Situ / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Low Genit Tract Dis Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá País de publicação: Estados Unidos