Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite.
Plotino, G; Colangeli, M; Özyürek, T; DeDeus, G; Panzetta, C; Castagnola, R; Grande, N M; Marigo, L.
Afiliação
  • Plotino G; Private Practice, Rome, Italy.
  • Colangeli M; Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy. mauro.colangeli22@gmail.com.
  • Özyürek T; School of Dentistry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. mauro.colangeli22@gmail.com.
  • DeDeus G; Department of Endodontics, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Panzetta C; Department of Endodontics, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Castagnola R; Department of Physics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  • Grande NM; Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Marigo L; School of Dentistry, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Clin Oral Investig ; 25(1): 237-245, 2021 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32500405
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of irrigants during and after the instrumentation compared with that of a conventional activation (CA) performed only after the instrumentation to remove smear layer and debris using different activation devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 70 single-rooted teeth were divided into a control group (no activation, n = 10) and two different experimental groups according to the irrigant activation protocol used: group 1 (CA), in which sodium hypochlorite was activated only after the use of the last mechanical file, and group 2 (SIA), in which activation was performed during and after the instrumentation. The two groups were divided into 3 subgroups according to the activation device used (n = 10): passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI, subgroup a), EndoActivator (EA, subgroup b), and EDDY (subgroup c). The roots were split longitudinally and observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate the presence of debris and smear layer, and the results were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: All activation protocols and devices were more effective than control group in removing smear layer and debris from all root canal thirds (P < 0.05), except for CA-EA (group 1b) in the apical third. In the apical third, SIA was found to be more effective than CA (P < 0.05) to remove smear layer and residual debris when PUI was used, to remove the smear layer when EA was used (P < 0.05), and to remove residual debris when EDDY was used (P < 0.05). PUI and EDDY removed statistically more smear layer and debris than EA in the apical third (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The SIA technique improved the smear layer and debris removal from the apical third and debris removal from the coronal third, and PUI and EDDY were more effective than EA in the apical third. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) technique may increase smear layer and debris removal.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Camada de Esfregaço Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Investig Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália País de publicação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Camada de Esfregaço Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Investig Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália País de publicação: Alemanha