Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-world insight into public access defibrillator use over five years.
Torney, Hannah; McAlister, Olibhéar; Harvey, Adam; Kernaghan, Amy; Funston, Rebecca; McCartney, Ben; Davis, Laura; Bond, Raymond; McEneaney, David; Adgey, Jennifer.
Afiliação
  • Torney H; Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, UK torney-h1@ulster.ac.uk.
  • McAlister O; HeartSine Technologies Ltd, Belfast, UK.
  • Harvey A; Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, UK.
  • Kernaghan A; HeartSine Technologies Ltd, Belfast, UK.
  • Funston R; HeartSine Technologies Ltd, Belfast, UK.
  • McCartney B; Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland, UK.
  • Davis L; HeartSine Technologies Ltd, Belfast, UK.
  • Bond R; HeartSine Technologies Ltd, Belfast, UK.
  • McEneaney D; HeartSine Technologies Ltd, Belfast, UK.
  • Adgey J; HeartSine Technologies Ltd, Belfast, UK.
Open Heart ; 7(1)2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32513668
BACKGROUND: Public access defibrillators (PADs) represent unique life-saving medical devices as they may be used by untrained lay rescuers. Collecting representative clinical data on these devices can be challenging. Here, we present results from a retrospective observational cohort study, describing real-world PAD utilisation over a 5-year period. METHODS: Data were collected between October 2012 and October 2017. Responders voluntarily submitted electronic data downloaded from HeartSine PADs, and patient demographics and other details using a case report form in exchange for a replacement battery and electrode pack. RESULTS: Data were collected for 977 patients (692 males, 70.8%; 255 females, 26.1%; 30 unknown, 3.1%). The mean age (SD) was 59 (18) years (range <1 year to 101 years). PAD usage occurred most commonly in homes (n=328, 33.6%), followed by public places (n=307, 31.4%) and medical facilities (n=128, 13.1%). Location was unknown in 40 (4.09%) events. Shocks were delivered to 354 patients. First shock success was 312 of 350 patients where it could be determined (89.1%, 95% CI 85.4% to 92.2%). Patients with reported response times ≤5 min were more likely to survive to hospital admission (89/296 (30.1%) vs 40/250 (16.0%), p<0.001). Response time was unknown for 431 events. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report global PAD usage in voluntarily submitted, unselected real-world cases and demonstrates the real-world effectiveness of PADs, as confirmed by first shock success.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cardioversão Elétrica / Desfibriladores / Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Open Heart Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cardioversão Elétrica / Desfibriladores / Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Open Heart Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido