Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Treated with Double Simultaneous Defibrillation: Pilot Study.
Kim, Hee Eun; Lee, Kui Ja; Jo, You Hwan; Lee, Jae Hyuk; Kim, Yu Jin; Kim, Joong Hee; Lee, Dong Keon; Kim, Dong Won; Park, Seung Min; Oh, Young Taeck.
Afiliação
  • Kim HE; Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 13620, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee KJ; Department of Emergency Medical Services, Kyungdong University, Wonju, Gangwon 26495, Republic of Korea.
  • Jo YH; Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 13620, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JH; Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 13620, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim YJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 13620, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JH; Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 13620, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee DK; Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 13620, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim DW; Department of Emergency Medicine, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Gangwon 24253, Republic of Korea.
  • Park SM; Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 13620, Republic of Korea.
  • Oh YT; Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi 13620, Republic of Korea.
Emerg Med Int ; 2020: 5470912, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32566304
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Refractory shockable rhythm has a high mortality rate and poor neurological outcome. Treatments for refractory shockable rhythm presenting after defibrillation and medical treatment are not definite. We conducted research on the application of double simultaneous defibrillation (DSiD) for refractory shockable rhythms.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective pilot study performed using medical records from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. The prephase was from January to December 2016. The post-phase was from January to December 2017. During the prephase, we conducted conventional defibrillation with one defibrillator, and during the post-phase, we conducted DSiD using two defibrillators. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital admission and good neurological outcome at 12 months. Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's exact test. Data were regarded statistically significant when p < 0.05.

RESULT:

A total of 38 patients were included. Twenty-one patients underwent conventional defibrillation, and 17 underwent DSiD. The DSiD group had a higher survival to admission rate (14/17 (82.4%) vs. 6/21 (28.6%), p=0.001) and showed a trend for higher survival to discharge (7/17 (41.2%) vs. 3/21 (14.3%), p=0.078). Good neurological outcome at 12 months of the DSiD group was higher than that of the conventional defibrillation group, but the difference was not statistically significant (5/17 (29.4%) vs 2/21 (9.5%), p=0.207).

CONCLUSION:

In patients with refractory shockable rhythms, DSiD has increased survival to hospital admission and a trend of increased survival to hospital discharge. However, DSiD did not improve neurological outcome at 12 months.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med Int Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Emerg Med Int Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article