Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of phyB and phyC loss-of-function mutations on the wheat transcriptome under short and long day photoperiods.
Kippes, Nestor; VanGessel, Carl; Hamilton, James; Akpinar, Ani; Budak, Hikmet; Dubcovsky, Jorge; Pearce, Stephen.
Afiliação
  • Kippes N; Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
  • VanGessel C; Current address: Department of Plant Biology, UC Davis Genome Center, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
  • Hamilton J; Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
  • Akpinar A; Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
  • Budak H; Montana BioAg Inc., Missoula, MT, 59802, USA.
  • Dubcovsky J; Montana BioAg Inc., Missoula, MT, 59802, USA.
  • Pearce S; Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
BMC Plant Biol ; 20(1): 297, 2020 Jun 29.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32600268
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Photoperiod signals provide important cues by which plants regulate their growth and development in response to predictable seasonal changes. Phytochromes, a family of red and far-red light receptors, play critical roles in regulating flowering time in response to changing photoperiods. A previous study showed that loss-of-function mutations in either PHYB or PHYC result in large delays in heading time and in the differential regulation of a large number of genes in wheat plants grown in an inductive long day (LD) photoperiod.

RESULTS:

We found that under non-inductive short-day (SD) photoperiods, phyB-null and phyC-null mutants were taller, had a reduced number of tillers, longer and wider leaves, and headed later than wild-type (WT) plants. The delay in heading between WT and phy mutants was greater in LD than in SD, confirming the importance of PHYB and PHYC in accelerating heading date in LDs. Both mutants flowered earlier in SD than LD, the inverse response to that of WT plants. In both SD and LD photoperiods, PHYB regulated more genes than PHYC. We identified subsets of differentially expressed and alternatively spliced genes that were specifically regulated by PHYB and PHYC in either SD or LD photoperiods, and a smaller set of genes that were regulated in both photoperiods. We found that photoperiod had a contrasting effect on transcript levels of the flowering promoting genes VRN-A1 and PPD-B1 in phyB and phyC mutants compared to the WT.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study confirms the major role of both PHYB and PHYC in flowering promotion in LD conditions. Transcriptome characterization revealed an unexpected reversion of the wheat LD plants into SD plants in the phyB-null and phyC-null mutants and identified flowering genes showing significant interactions between phytochromes and photoperiod that may be involved in this phenomenon. Our RNA-seq data provides insight into light signaling pathways in inductive and non-inductive photoperiods and a set of candidate genes to dissect the underlying developmental regulatory networks in wheat.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fitocromo / Triticum / Fotoperíodo / Transcriptoma Idioma: En Revista: BMC Plant Biol Assunto da revista: BOTANICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fitocromo / Triticum / Fotoperíodo / Transcriptoma Idioma: En Revista: BMC Plant Biol Assunto da revista: BOTANICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos