Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of social media (Facebook), targeted mailing, and in-person solicitation for the recruitment of young adult in a diabetes self-management clinical trial.
Salvy, Sarah-Jeanne; Carandang, Kristine; Vigen, Cheryl Lp; Concha-Chavez, Alyssa; Sequeira, Paola A; Blanchard, Jeanine; Diaz, Jesus; Raymond, Jennifer; Pyatak, Elizabeth A.
Afiliação
  • Salvy SJ; Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, USA.
  • Carandang K; University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Vigen CL; Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Concha-Chavez A; Northern Arizona University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
  • Sequeira PA; Los Angeles Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Blanchard J; Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Diaz J; Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Raymond J; Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Pyatak EA; Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Clin Trials ; 17(6): 664-674, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32627589
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Research is needed to identify promising recruitment strategies to reach and engage diverse young adults in diabetes clinical research. The aim of this study was to examine the relative strengths and weaknesses of three recruitment strategies used in a diabetes self-management clinical trial: social media advertising (Facebook), targeted mailing, and in-person solicitation of clinic patients. METHODS: Strategies were compared in terms of (1) cost-effectiveness (i.e. cost of recruitment/number of enrolled participants), (2) ability to yield participants who would not otherwise be reached by alternative strategies, and (3) likelihood of participants recruited through each strategy to adhere to study procedures. We further explored the appeal (overall and among age and gender subgroups) of social media advertisement features. RESULTS: In-person recruitment of clinic patients was overall the most cost-effective strategy. However, differences in demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics of participants recruited via different strategies suggest that the combination of these approaches yielded a more diverse sample than would any one strategy alone. Once successfully enrolled, there was no difference in study completion and intervention adherence between individuals recruited by the three recruitment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, the utility of a recruitment strategy is defined by its ability to effectively attract people representative of the target population who are willing to enroll in and complete the study. Leveraging a variety of recruitment strategies appears to produce a more representative sample of young adults, including those who are less engaged in diabetes care.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Postais / Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Seleção de Pacientes / Diabetes Mellitus / Mídias Sociais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Trials Assunto da revista: MEDICINA / TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Serviços Postais / Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Seleção de Pacientes / Diabetes Mellitus / Mídias Sociais Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Trials Assunto da revista: MEDICINA / TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Reino Unido