Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Risk of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Tempfer, Clemens B; Hilal, Ziad; Kern, Peter; Juhasz-Boess, Ingolf; Rezniczek, Günther A.
Afiliação
  • Tempfer CB; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany and Comprehensive Cancer Center of the Ruhr-Universität Bochum (RUCCC), 44708 Bochum, Germany.
  • Hilal Z; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany and Comprehensive Cancer Center of the Ruhr-Universität Bochum (RUCCC), 44708 Bochum, Germany.
  • Kern P; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, St. Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Bochum, 44787 Bochum, Germany.
  • Juhasz-Boess I; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.
  • Rezniczek GA; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany and Comprehensive Cancer Center of the Ruhr-Universität Bochum (RUCCC), 44708 Bochum, Germany.
Cancers (Basel) ; 12(8)2020 Aug 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32781573
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is an appropriate treatment for women with the climacteric syndrome. The estrogen component of MHT effectively alleviates climacteric symptoms but also stimulates the endometrium and thus may increase the risk of endometrial cancer (EC). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We performed a systematic literature search of the databases PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials reporting on the prevalence and/or incidence of EC among women using MHT.

RESULTS:

31 publications reporting on 21,306 women with EC diagnosed during or after MHT were identified. A significantly reduced risk of EC among continuous-combined (cc)MHT users with synthetic progestins (SPs) was demonstrated in 10/19 studies with odds ratios (ORs)/hazard ratios (HRs) between 0.24 and 0.71. Only one study documented an increased risk of EC among long-term users (≥10 years), not confirmed in three other sub-group analyses of women with ≥6, ≥5, and >10 years of ccMHT use. A significantly increased risk of EC among users of sequential-combined (sc)MHT with SPs was demonstrated in 6/12 studies with ORs/HRs between 1.38 and 4.35. Number of days of progestin per month was a significant modulator of EC risk. A decreased risk of EC was seen in obese women. Two studies documented an increased risk of EC among users of cc/scMHT with micronized progesterone. A significantly increased risk of EC among estrogen-only MHT users was demonstrated in 9/12 studies with ORs/HRs between 1.45 and 4.46. The adverse effect of estrogen-only MHT was greatest among obese women.

CONCLUSION:

ccMHT with SPs reduces the risk of EC, whereas estrogen-only MHT increases the risk. scMHT with SPs and cc/scMHT with micronized progesterone increase the risk of EC depending on type of progestin, progestin dosage, and duration of MHT use.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha