Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Minimally invasive stabilization of sacral fractures]. / Minimal-invasive Stabilisierung bei Frakturen des Sakrums.
Decker, S; Krettek, C; Stübig, T.
Afiliação
  • Decker S; Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland. Decker.Sebastian@mh-hannover.de.
  • Krettek C; Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
  • Stübig T; Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
Unfallchirurg ; 123(10): 774-782, 2020 Oct.
Article em De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32821977
BACKGROUND: Sacral fractures can be of traumatic origin and can also occur as insufficiency fractures. While the therapeutic target of mechanically stable insufficiency fractures is mainly pain relief, mechanically unstable insufficiency fractures and traumatic sacral fractures following high-energy trauma require biomechanical stabilization. Various surgical strategies are available for this, whereby minimally invasive techniques are now preferred whenever possible. OBJECTIVE: This article presents the clinical challenges and options for minimally invasive treatment of sacral fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Selected important study data are discussed and our own treatment approach is presented. RESULTS: The most important minimally invasive techniques for operative treatment of sacral fractures are presented: sacroiliac screw osteosynthesis, lumbopelvic stabilization and sacroplasty. The selection of the surgical technique should be made on an individual basis. While sacroiliac screw osteosynthesis is the international gold standard, diverse authors have also published minimally invasive techniques for lumbopelvic stabilization. The latter enables a higher mechanical stability. In contrast, sacroplasty should only be used as an alternative treatment in insufficiency fractures. Comparative studies of the described techniques are still missing. CONCLUSION: All surgical options have their indications. Nevertheless, the biomechanical stability which can be achieved differs widely. Therefore, an exact analysis should be carried out of what is necessary with respect to reduction and retention and what should be achieved when treating sacral fractures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ossos Pélvicos / Fraturas de Estresse / Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral / Fraturas Ósseas Limite: Humans Idioma: De Revista: Unfallchirurg Assunto da revista: TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ossos Pélvicos / Fraturas de Estresse / Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral / Fraturas Ósseas Limite: Humans Idioma: De Revista: Unfallchirurg Assunto da revista: TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Alemanha