Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Days gained response discriminates treatment response in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab-based therapies.
Singleton, Kyle W; Porter, Alyx B; Hu, Leland S; Johnston, Sandra K; Bond, Kamila M; Rickertsen, Cassandra R; De Leon, Gustavo; Whitmire, Scott A; Clark-Swanson, Kamala R; Mrugala, Maciej M; Swanson, Kristin R.
Afiliação
  • Singleton KW; Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Porter AB; Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
  • Hu LS; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Johnston SK; Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Bond KM; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
  • Rickertsen CR; Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • De Leon G; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Whitmire SA; Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Clark-Swanson KR; Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Mrugala MM; Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
  • Swanson KR; Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Neurooncol Adv ; 2(1): vdaa085, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32864609
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Accurate assessments of patient response to therapy are a critical component of personalized medicine. In glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive form of brain cancer, tumor growth dynamics are heterogenous across patients, complicating assessment of treatment response. This study aimed to analyze days gained (DG), a burgeoning model-based dynamic metric, for response assessment in patients with recurrent GBM who received bevacizumab-based therapies.

METHODS:

DG response scores were calculated using volumetric tumor segmentations for patients receiving bevacizumab with and without concurrent cytotoxic therapy (N = 62). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were implemented to examine DG prognostic relationship to overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the onset of treatment for recurrent GBM.

RESULTS:

In patients receiving concurrent bevacizumab and cytotoxic therapy, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in OS and PFS at DG cutoffs consistent with previously identified values from newly diagnosed GBM using T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (T1Gd). DG scores for bevacizumab monotherapy patients only approached significance for PFS. Cox regression showed that increases of 25 DG on T1Gd imaging were significantly associated with a 12.5% reduction in OS hazard for concurrent therapy patients and a 4.4% reduction in PFS hazard for bevacizumab monotherapy patients.

CONCLUSION:

DG has significant meaning in recurrent therapy as a metric of treatment response, even in the context of anti-angiogenic therapies. This provides further evidence supporting the use of DG as an adjunct response metric that quantitatively connects treatment response and clinical outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Neurooncol Adv Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Neurooncol Adv Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article