Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill score to nutritional risk stratification of trauma victims: A multicenter observational study.
Iwuchukwu, Chinenye; O'Keefe, Grant E; Day, Andrew G; Jiang, Xuran; Heyland, Daren K.
Afiliação
  • Iwuchukwu C; From the Department of Surgery (C.I.), University of Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi; Department of Surgery (G.E.O.), Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Clinical Evaluation Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Centre (A.G.D., X.J.); and Department of Critical Care Medicine (D.K.H.), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 89(6): 1143-1148, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925580
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score was developed to identify patients most likely to benefit from nutritional therapies and to stratify or select study subjects for clinical trials. The score is not validated in trauma victims in whom adequate nutritional support is important and difficult to achieve. We sought to determine whether a higher mNUTRIC score was associated with worse outcomes and whether caloric and protein intake improved outcome more in patients classified as high risk relative to those classified as low risk.

METHODS:

We analyzed a prospectively collected database of patients from intensive care units globally. The primary outcome was 60-day hospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was time to discharge alive. We compared outcomes between high and low mNUTRIC score groups and also tested whether the association between outcome and nutrition intake was modified by the mNUTRIC score.

RESULTS:

A total of 771 trauma patients were included. Most (585; 76%) had a low-risk mNUTRIC (0-4) score, and 186 (24%) had a high-risk (5-9) mNUTRIC score. The overall 60-day mortality was 13%. Patients in the high mNUTRIC group had a higher risk of death than those in the low mNUTRIC group (adjusted odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-4.2). Overall, there was no relationship between caloric or protein intake and clinical outcomes. However, patients in the high mNUTRIC group fared better with increasing caloric and protein intake, whereas subjects in the low mNUTRIC score group did not (p values for interaction with the mNUTRIC score for time to discharge alive was p = 0.014 for calories and was p = 0.004 for protein).

CONCLUSION:

A high mNUTRIC score identifies trauma patients at higher risk for poor outcomes and those who may benefit from higher caloric and protein intake. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiological/Prognostic, level III.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ferimentos e Lesões / Estado Nutricional / Apoio Nutricional / Desnutrição Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ferimentos e Lesões / Estado Nutricional / Apoio Nutricional / Desnutrição Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá