Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rabies vaccination strategies in the Netherlands in 2018: a cost evaluation.
Suijkerbuijk, Anita Wm; Mangen, Marie-Josee J; Haverkate, Manon R; Luppino, Floriana S; Bantjes, Sabine E; Visser, Leo G; Swaan, Corien M; Ruijs, Wilhelmina Lm; Over, Eelco Ab.
Afiliação
  • Suijkerbuijk AW; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
  • Mangen MJ; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
  • Haverkate MR; These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.
  • Luppino FS; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
  • Bantjes SE; These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.
  • Visser LG; Eurocross Assistance, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Swaan CM; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
  • Ruijs WL; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Over EA; Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Euro Surveill ; 25(38)2020 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975187
ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe risk of contracting rabies is low for travellers. However, the number of Dutch travellers potentially exposed abroad following an animal-associated injury and needing post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has increased, resulting in increased costs.AimHere, we evaluated the costs and the cost-effectiveness of different pre- and post-exposure interventions in the Netherlands, taking into account the 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations for the prevention of rabies.MethodsA decision tree-based economic model was constructed. We calculated and compared the cost of different WHO pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) recommendations, intramuscular vs intradermal vaccination and PEP subsequent to increased vaccination coverage in risk groups. We estimated cost-effectiveness, expressed as incremental costs per rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) administration averted, using a societal perspective. Statistical uncertainty regarding number of travellers and vaccination coverage was assessed.ResultsTotal costs at the national level were highest using previous WHO recommendations from 2012, estimated at EUR 15.4 million annually. Intradermal vaccinations in combination with the current recommendations led to the lowest costs, estimated at EUR 10.3 million. Higher vaccination uptake resulted in higher overall costs. The incremental costs per RIG administration averted varied from EUR 21,300-46,800.ConclusionsThe change in rabies PrEP and PEP recommendations in 2018 reduced total costs. Strategies with increased pre-travel vaccination uptake led to fewer RIG administrations and fewer vaccinations after exposure but also to higher total costs. Although larger scale intradermal administration of rabies vaccine can reduce total costs of PrEP and can positively influence vaccination uptake, it remains a costly intervention.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raiva / Vírus da Raiva / Vacina Antirrábica / Profilaxia Pós-Exposição / Profilaxia Pré-Exposição Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Euro Surveill Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raiva / Vírus da Raiva / Vacina Antirrábica / Profilaxia Pós-Exposição / Profilaxia Pré-Exposição Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Euro Surveill Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda