Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgically Extracted Epididymal Sperm from Men with Obstructive Azoospermia Results in Similar In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes Compared with Normal Ejaculated Sperm.
Hayon, Solomon; Moustafa, Sarah; Boylan, Caitlin; Kohn, Taylor P; Peavey, Mary; Coward, R Matthew.
Afiliação
  • Hayon S; Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Moustafa S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Boylan C; UNC Fertility, Raleigh, North Carolina.
  • Kohn TP; UNC Fertility, Raleigh, North Carolina.
  • Peavey M; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Coward RM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
J Urol ; 205(2): 561-567, 2021 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026908
PURPOSE: Controversy exists around the use of epididymal sperm for in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for couples with obstructive azoospermia, and the ability to reliably predict fertility outcomes with surgically extracted epididymal sperm remains limited. To provide additional clinical context, we sought to compare in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes of epididymal sperm from couples with obstructive azoospermia to outcomes of couples using normal, ejaculated sperm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a case-control analysis of 40 couples who underwent office based epididymal sperm retrieval for obstructive azoospermia followed by in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with a control group of 38 female, age matched couples with no evidence of female factor infertility who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection with normal, ejaculated sperm. Primary outcome was live birth on the initial embryo transfer. RESULTS: Epididymal samples yielded a median total motile sperm count of 9.1 million, compared to 81 million for ejaculated sperm. On the primary embryo transfer fertilization rate (71% vs 77%, p=0.2), blastulation rate (48% vs 59%, p=0.09), clinical pregnancy rate (70% vs 58%, p=0.4), and live birth rate (58% vs 47%, p=0.4) did not differ between epididymal and ejaculated sperm groups. CONCLUSIONS: For couples with a male partner with obstructive azoospermia epididymal sperm in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes compare similarly with age matched controls undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection using normal, ejaculated sperm. These results may help reproductive surgeons provide reassurance about the use of obstructed epididymal sperm as well as help guide discussions about anticipated outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fertilização in vitro / Taxa de Gravidez / Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas / Ejaculação / Azoospermia / Recuperação Espermática Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fertilização in vitro / Taxa de Gravidez / Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas / Ejaculação / Azoospermia / Recuperação Espermática Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos