Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Caregiver engagement practices in National Cancer Institute Clinical Oncology Research Program settings: Implications for research to advance the field.
Nightingale, Chandylen L; Sterba, Katherine R; McLouth, Laurie E; Kent, Erin E; Dressler, Emily V; Dest, Alexandra; Snavely, Anna C; Adonizio, Christian S; Wojtowicz, Mark; Neuman, Heather B; Kazak, Anne E; Carlos, Ruth C; Hudson, Matthew F; Unger, Joseph M; Kamen, Charles S; Weaver, Kathryn E.
Afiliação
  • Nightingale CL; Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
  • Sterba KR; Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
  • McLouth LE; Department of Behavioral Science, Markey Cancer Center, Center for Health Equity Transformation, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Kent EE; Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Dressler EV; Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
  • Dest A; Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
  • Snavely AC; Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
  • Adonizio CS; Center for Oncology Research and Innovation, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania.
  • Wojtowicz M; Center for Oncology Research and Innovation, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania.
  • Neuman HB; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Kazak AE; Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System, Wilmington, Delaware.
  • Carlos RC; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Hudson MF; NCORP of the Carolinas, Prisma Health Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina.
  • Unger JM; SWOG Cancer Research Network Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Kamen CS; Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
  • Weaver KE; Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Cancer ; 127(4): 639-647, 2021 02 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33136296
BACKGROUND: Supportive care interventions have demonstrated benefits for both informal and/or family cancer caregivers and their patients, but uptake generally is poor. To the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the availability of supportive care services in community oncology practices, as well as engagement practices to connect caregivers with these services. METHODS: Questions from the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP)'s 2017 Landscape Survey examined caregiver engagement practices (ie, caregiver identification, needs assessment, and supportive care service availability). Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the caregiver engagement outcomes and practice group characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 204 practice groups responded to each of the primary outcome questions. Only 40.2% of practice groups endorsed having a process with which to systematically identify and document caregivers, although approximately 76% were routinely using assessment tools to identify caregiver needs and approximately 63.7% had supportive care services available to caregivers. Caregiver identification was more common in sites affiliated with a critical access hospital (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; P = .013), and assessments were less common in safety-net practices (OR, 0.41; P = .013). Supportive care services were more commonly available in the Western region of the United States, in practices with inpatient services (OR, 2.96; P = .012), and in practices affiliated with a critical access hospital (OR, 3.31; P = .010). CONCLUSIONS: Although many practice groups provide supportive care services, fewer than one-half systematically identify and document informal cancer caregivers. Expanding fundamental engagement practices such as caregiver identification, assessment, and service provision will be critical to support recent calls to improve caregivers' well-being and skills to perform caregiving tasks.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde / Cuidadores / Oncologia / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde / Cuidadores / Oncologia / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos