Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety Considerations for the Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as Treatment for Coma Recovery in People With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
Kletzel, Sandra L; Aaronson, Alexandra L; Guernon, Ann; Carbone, Christina; Chaudhry, Noor; Walsh, Elyse; Conneely, Mark; Patil, Vijaya; Roth, Elliott; Steiner, Monica; Pacheco, Marilyn; Rosenow, Joshua; Bender Pape, Theresa L.
Afiliação
  • Kletzel SL; The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Research Service, Edward Hines Jr VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois (Drs Kletzel, Aaronson, Guernon, Walsh, Patil, Steiner, Pacheco, and Bender Pape and Mr Chaudhry); The Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Service Line, Hines VA, Hines, Illinois (Dr Aaronson) Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital/Northwestern Medicine, Wheaton, Illinois (Drs Guernon and Bender Pape); Battle Creek VA Medical Center, Kalamazoo, Michigan (Dr Carbone); Department of Physical
J Head Trauma Rehabil ; 35(6): 430-438, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33165155
OBJECTIVE: For persons in states of disordered consciousness (DoC) after severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI), we report cumulative findings from safety examinations, including serious adverse events (AEs) of a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) parameter protocol in 2 different studies. PARTICIPANTS: Seven persons in states of DoC after sTBI with widespread neuropathology, but no large lesions in proximity to the site of rTMS. One participant had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt with programmable valve. METHODS: Two clinical trials each providing 30 rTMS sessions to the right or left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, involving 300 to 600 pulses over 1 or 2 sessions daily. One study provided concomitant amantadine. Safety indicators monitored related to sleep, temperature, blood pressure, skin integrity, sweating, weight loss, infections, and seizure. RESULTS: Average changes for monitored indicators were of mild severity, with 75 nonserious AEs and 1 serious AE (seizure). The participant incurring a seizure resumed rTMS while taking antieplieptics without further seizure activity. CONCLUSIONS: Considering elevated risks for this patient population and conservative patient selection, findings indicate a relatively safe profile for the specified rTMS protocols; however, potential for seizure induction must be monitored. Future research for this population can be broadened to include patients previously excluded on the basis of profiles raising safety concerns.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coma / Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana / Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Head Trauma Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO / TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Coma / Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana / Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Head Trauma Rehabil Assunto da revista: REABILITACAO / TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos