Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antimicrobial use in 22 U.S. beef feedyards: 2016-2017.
Hope, Katie J; Apley, Michael D; Schrag, Nora F D; Lubbers, Brian V; Singer, Randall S.
Afiliação
  • Hope KJ; College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
  • Apley MD; College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
  • Schrag NFD; College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
  • Lubbers BV; College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
  • Singer RS; Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 67 Suppl 1: 94-110, 2020 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33201603
ABSTRACT
This study describes antimicrobial use in 22 U.S. beef feedyards by use of two metrics milligrams of antimicrobial per kilogram of liveweight sold (mg/kg-LW) and antimicrobial regimens per animal year (Reg/AY). The primary objectives were to determine the feasibility of collecting antimicrobial use data at the level of the production system and to identify factors unique to feedyard systems which may confound interpretation of summarized antimicrobial use measures. Records were accessed directly from feedyards or through a data intermediary and then subjected to a process of standardization and quality assurance. Use is reported at the study level with all individual cattle lots from all feedyards combined, as well as at the feedyard level where values were first calculated for each feedyard and then expressed as means, standard deviations and median values. Use at the study level is first reported by antimicrobial class and then by antimicrobial class within the use categories of in-feed, control of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) and individual animal treatment. Due to wide variations of antimicrobial class within use category, feedyard level antimicrobial use is reported only by antimicrobial class. Use values for medically important and not medically important antimicrobial classes are reported separately. Regimens are described for each antimicrobial class within use category by milligrams per regimen and by timeframe from first to last administration. The authors' selection of measures reported here was driven by a desire to minimize necessary assumptions, resulting in transparent reporting of values which can be directly related back to the factors within feedyard systems which may have influenced calculations. Reporting the number of regimens stratified by antimicrobial class within use category and then describing the characteristics of the reported regimens (milligrams per regimen and timeframe) optimize these objectives for reporting.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bovinos / Doenças dos Bovinos / Anti-Infecciosos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Zoonoses Public Health Assunto da revista: MEDICINA VETERINARIA / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bovinos / Doenças dos Bovinos / Anti-Infecciosos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Zoonoses Public Health Assunto da revista: MEDICINA VETERINARIA / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...