Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A self-report questionnaire to detect hand dermatitis in nurses.
Parsons, V; Williams, H C; English, J; Llewellyn, J; Ntani, G; Madan, I.
Afiliação
  • Parsons V; Occupational Health Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust/Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Williams HC; Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • English J; Dermatology, Circle Nottingham NHS Treatment Centre, Nottingham, UK.
  • Llewellyn J; Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
  • Ntani G; Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Madan I; Occupational Health Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust/Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 70(9): 645-648, 2020 Dec 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33219375
BACKGROUND: Hand dermatitis is highly prevalent among nurses due to their frequent exposure to wet work. Providing cost-effective dermatological health surveillance for this occupational group presents a challenge to health service providers. AIMS: To ascertain the predictive value of nurses' self-assessment of whether they had current hand dermatitis using a screening questionnaire when compared with the assessment made by a dermatologist of the nurses' hand photographs. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study comparing the self-report decision made by student and intensive care nurses using a single hand dermatitis screening question with the clinical assessment of their hand photographs made by dermatologists using a standardized photographic guide. RESULTS: We analysed data collected at study baseline (n = 1599). The results showed that the screening question had a high negative predictive value (91%; 95% CI 89-93), but a low positive predictive value (39%; 95% CI 34-45). It demonstrated acceptable accuracy in distinguishing those with and without the disease (area under the receiver operator curve = 0.7) and had a high specificity (86%; 95% CI 84-88) but a sensitivity of only 52% (95% CI 46-59) in identifying hand dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: We found that nurses were able to accurately self-assess themselves as not having any signs of hand dermatitis. By contrast, they were less able to accurately self-assess positive cases suggesting under-recognition of early disease. We propose that a questionnaire containing a single hand dermatitis screening question should be considered as a tool for screening out clear cases as part of a workplace health surveillance programme for detecting hand dermatitis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermatite Ocupacional / Dermatoses da Mão / Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Occup Med (Lond) Assunto da revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dermatite Ocupacional / Dermatoses da Mão / Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Occup Med (Lond) Assunto da revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido