Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Failure of SCS MR-Conditional Modes Due to High Impedance: A Review of Literature and Case Series.
Jotwani, Rohan; Abd-Elsayed, Alaa; Villegas, Kristine; Shakil, Ahmed; Gulati, Amitabh; Sayed, Dawood; Lam, Christopher; Mehta, Neel.
Afiliação
  • Jotwani R; Anesthesiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Abd-Elsayed A; Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. alaaawny@hotmail.com.
  • Villegas K; Anesthesiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Shakil A; Anesthesiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Gulati A; Anesthesia and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Sayed D; Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
  • Lam C; Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
  • Mehta N; Anesthesiology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Pain Ther ; 10(1): 729-737, 2021 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33219927
INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conditional modes are a novel feature for certain Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices. However, there is a paucity of literature around the limitation of MRI-conditional modes ("MRI safe"), specifically in clinical scenarios where urgent MRIs may be needed. One such limitation is load impedance, referring to the circuit's resistance to the current being generated by the system. High impedance can limit the MRI-conditional mode capability, presenting potential harm to a patient undergoing an MRI or make an MRI unable to be completed. METHODS: Three cases were identified, and informed consent was obtained. All information was obtained via retrospective chart review. RESULTS: In this case series of three patients where MRI-conditional SCS systems were unable to be placed in "MRI safe" settings, preventing timely MRI study completion in the setting of high impedance, all three were required to undergo alternative imaging including CT scans, and two patients ultimately had the system explanted and one chose to be re-implanted after completion of scans. CONCLUSION: This case series highlights the need for further investigation of impedance in SCS systems and potential limitations for future MRI usage. The review of literature of impedance in SCS shows both device- and physiologic-related etiologies for changes in impedance that warrant consideration by the implanting physician.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pain Ther Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Nova Zelândia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pain Ther Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Nova Zelândia