Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Internal medicine resident perspectives on scoring USMLE as pass/fail.
Wallach, Sara L; Williams, Christopher; Chow, Robert T; Jadhav, Nagesh; Kuehl, Sapna; Raj, Jaya M; Alweis, Richard.
Afiliação
  • Wallach SL; Department of Medicine, St. Francis Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA.
  • Williams C; Department of Medicine, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ, USA.
  • Chow RT; Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Jadhav N; Department of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
  • Kuehl S; Department of Medicine, The University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Raj JM; Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Alweis R; Department of Medicine, Rochester General Hospital Internal Medicine Residency Program, Rochester, NY, USA.
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect ; 10(5): 381-385, 2020 Sep 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33235666
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The scoring rubric on the USMLE Step 1 examination will be changing to pass/fail in January 2022. This study elicits internal medicine resident perspectives on USMLE pass/fail scoring at the national level.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess internal medicine resident opinions regarding USMLE pass/fail scoring and examine how variables such as gender, scores on USMLE 1 and 2, PGY status and type of medical school are associated with these results.

METHODS:

In the fall of 2019, the authors surveyed current internal medicine residents via an on-line tool distributed through their program directors. Respondents indicated their Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores from five categorical ranges. Questions on medical school type, year of training year, and gender were included. The results were analyzed utilizing Pearson Chi-square testing and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS:

4012 residents responded, reflecting 13% of internal medicine residents currently training in the USA. Fifty-five percent of respondents disagreed/strongly disagreed with pass/fail scoring and 34% agreed/strongly agreed. Group-based differences were significant for gender, PGY level, Step 1 score, and medical school type; a higher percentage of males, those training at the PGY1 level, and graduates of international medical schools (IMGs) disagreed with pass/fail reporting. In addition, high scorers on Step 1 were more likely to disagree with pass/fail reporting than low scoring residents.

CONCLUSION:

Our results suggest that a majority of internal medicine residents, currently training in the USA prefer that USMLE numerical scoring is retained and not changed to pass/fail.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos