Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Early Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Management in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting: Results From the TOPAS Prospective Observational Cohort Study.
Annabi, Mohamed-Salah; Côté, Nancy; Dahou, Abdellaziz; Bartko, Philipp E; Bergler-Klein, Jutta; Burwash, Ian G; Orwat, Stefan; Baumgartner, Helmut; Mascherbauer, Julia; Mundigler, Gerald; Fukui, Miho; Cavalcante, Joao; Ribeiro, Henrique B; Rodès-Cabau, Josep; Clavel, Marie-Annick; Pibarot, Philippe.
Afiliação
  • Annabi MS; Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval Québec Canada.
  • Côté N; Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval Québec Canada.
  • Dahou A; Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval Québec Canada.
  • Bartko PE; Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine II Medical University of ViennaVienna General Hospital Vienna Austria.
  • Bergler-Klein J; Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine II Medical University of ViennaVienna General Hospital Vienna Austria.
  • Burwash IG; University of Ottawa Heart Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.
  • Orwat S; Department of Cardiology III-Adult Congenital and Valvular Heart Disease University Hospital Muenster Muenster Germany.
  • Baumgartner H; Department of Cardiology III-Adult Congenital and Valvular Heart Disease University Hospital Muenster Muenster Germany.
  • Mascherbauer J; Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine II Medical University of ViennaVienna General Hospital Vienna Austria.
  • Mundigler G; Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine II Medical University of ViennaVienna General Hospital Vienna Austria.
  • Fukui M; Cardiology Minneapolis Heart Institute Minneapolis MN.
  • Cavalcante J; Division of Cardiology University of Pittsburgh PA.
  • Ribeiro HB; Cardiology Minneapolis Heart Institute Minneapolis MN.
  • Rodès-Cabau J; Heart Institute of São Paulo (InCor)University of São Paulo Brazil.
  • Clavel MA; Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval Québec Canada.
  • Pibarot P; Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval Québec Canada.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(24): e017870, 2020 12 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33289422
ABSTRACT
Background No randomized comparison of early (ie, ≤3 months) aortic valve replacement (AVR) versus conservative management or of transcatheter AVR (TAVR) versus surgical AVR has been conducted in patients with low-flow, low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS). Methods and Results A total of 481 consecutive patients (75±10 years; 71% men) with LFLG AS (aortic valve area ≤0.6 cm2/m2 and mean gradient <40 mm Hg), 72% with classic LFLG and 28% with paradoxical LFLG, were prospectively recruited in the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. True-severe AS or pseudo-severe AS was adjudicated by flow-independent criteria. During follow-up (median [IQR] 36 [11-60] months), 220 patients died. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting to address the bias of nonrandom treatment assignment, early AVR (n=272) was associated with a major overall survival benefit (hazard ratio [HR], 0.34 [95% CI, 0.24-0.50]; P<0.001). This benefit was observed in patients with true-severe AS but also with pseudo-severe AS (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.18-0.81]; P=0.01), and in classic (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.22-0.49]; P<0.001) and paradoxical LFLG AS (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.20-0.92]; P=0.03). Compared with conservative management in the conventional multivariate model, trans femoral TAVR was associated with the best survival (HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.12-0.43]; P<0.001), followed by surgical AVR (HR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.23-0.56]; P<0.001) and alternative-access TAVR (HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.31-0.82]; P=0.007). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting model, trans femoral TAVR appeared to be superior to surgical AVR (HR [95% CI] 0.28 [0.11-0.72]; P=0.008) with regard to survival. Conclusions In this large prospective observational study of LFLG AS, early AVR appeared to confer a major survival benefit in both classic and paradoxical LFLG AS. This benefit seems to extend to the subgroup with pseudo-severe AS. Our findings suggest that TAVR using femoral access might be the best strategy in these patients. Registration URL https//www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier NCT01835028.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Artéria Femoral / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter / Tratamento Conservador Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Am Heart Assoc Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Artéria Femoral / Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter / Tratamento Conservador Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Am Heart Assoc Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article