Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Ma, Yang-Yang; Leng, Yin; Xing, Yan-Li; Li, Hong-Mei; Chen, Ji-Bing; Niu, Li-Zhi.
Afiliação
  • Ma YY; Central Laboratory, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510665, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Leng Y; Department of Oncology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510665, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Xing YL; Department of Oncology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510665, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Li HM; Department of Oncology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510665, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Chen JB; Central Laboratory, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510665, Guangdong Province, China.
  • Niu LZ; Department of Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Fuda Cancer Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510665, Guangdong Province, China. niuboshi@fudahospital.com.
World J Clin Cases ; 8(22): 5564-5575, 2020 Nov 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33344547
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a common malignant digestive system tumor that ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The prognosis of LAPC is poor even after standard treatment. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablative strategy for LAPC. Several studies have confirmed the safety of IRE. To date, no prospective studies have been performed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of conventional gemcitabine (GEM) plus concurrent IRE.

AIM:

To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conventional GEM plus concurrent IRE and GEM alone for LAPC.

METHODS:

From February 2016 to September 2017, a total of 68 LAPC patients were treated with GEM plus concurrent IRE n = 33) or GEM alone n = 35). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and procedure-related complications were compared between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify any prognostic factors.

RESULTS:

There were no treatment-related deaths. The technical success rate of IRE ablation was 100%. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer OS from the time of diagnosis of LAPC (19.8 mo vs 9.3 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer PFS (8.3 mo vs 4.7 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. Tumor volume less than 37 cm3 and GEM plus concurrent IRE were identified as significant favorable factors for both the OS and PFS.

CONCLUSION:

Gemcitabine plus concurrent IRE is an effective treatment for patients with LAPC.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: World J Clin Cases Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: World J Clin Cases Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China