Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association of Intensive Lifestyle and Metformin Interventions With Frailty in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study.
Hazuda, Helen P; Pan, Qing; Florez, Hermes; Luchsinger, José A; Crandall, Jill P; Venditti, Elizabeth M; Golden, Sherita H; Kriska, Andrea M; Bray, George A.
Afiliação
  • Hazuda HP; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
  • Pan Q; Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University.
  • Florez H; University of Miami, Florida.
  • Luchsinger JA; Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • Crandall JP; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
  • Venditti EM; University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Golden SH; Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Kriska AM; University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Bray GA; Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci ; 76(5): 929-936, 2021 04 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33428709
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Frailty is a geriatric syndrome of decreased physiologic reserve and resistance to stressors that results in increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes with aging. Diabetes and hyperglycemia are established risk factors for frailty. We sought to examine whether the odds of frailty among individuals at high risk of diabetes randomized to treatment with intensive lifestyle (ILS), metformin, or placebo differed after long-term follow-up.

METHOD:

The sample comprised participants in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) clinical trial, who continued follow-up in the DPP Outcomes Study (DPPOS) and completed frailty assessments in DPPOS Years 8 (n = 2385) and 10 (n = 2289), approximately 12 and 14 years after DPP randomization. Frailty was classified using Fried Frailty Phenotype criteria. GEE models adjusting for visit year with repeated measures pooled for Years 8 and 10 were used to estimate pairwise odds ratios (ORs) between ILS, metformin, and placebo for the outcomes of frail and prefrail versus nonfrail.

RESULTS:

Frailty prevalence by treatment group was ILS = 3.0%, metformin = 5.4%, placebo = 5.7% at Year 8, and ILS = 3.6%, metformin = 5.3%, placebo = 5.4% at Year 10. Odds ratios (95% CI) estimated with GEE models were ILS versus placebo, 0.62 (0.42-0.93), p = .022; metformin versus placebo, 0.99 (0.69-1.42), p = .976; and ILS versus metformin, 0.63 (0.42-0.94), p = .022. Odds of being frail versus nonfrail were 37% lower for ILS compared to metformin and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS:

Early ILS intervention, at an average age of about 50 years, in persons at high risk of diabetes may reduce frailty prevalence in later life. Metformin may be ineffective in reducing frailty prevalence. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBERS NCT00004992 (DPP) and NCT00038727 (DPPOS).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Fragilidade / Hipoglicemiantes / Estilo de Vida / Metformina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Assunto da revista: GERIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Fragilidade / Hipoglicemiantes / Estilo de Vida / Metformina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Assunto da revista: GERIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article