Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Supraacetabular osseous corridor: defining dimensions, sex differences, and alternatives.
Wang, Miqi; Jacobs, Robert C; Bartlett, Craig S; Schottel, Patrick C.
Afiliação
  • Wang M; Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, 4th Floor Safford Hall, 95 Carrigan Dr., Burlington, VT, 05405, USA. mimi.wang@gmail.com.
  • Jacobs RC; Department of Orthopaedic, Surgery University of Minnesota, 2450 Riverside Ave South, R200, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
  • Bartlett CS; Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, 4th Floor Safford Hall, 95 Carrigan Dr., Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
  • Schottel PC; Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Vermont, 4th Floor Safford Hall, 95 Carrigan Dr., Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 142(7): 1429-1434, 2022 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33507379
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The supraacetabular (SA) corridor extends from the anterior inferior iliac spine to the posterior ilium and can safely accommodate implants to stabilize pelvic and acetabular fractures. However, quantitative analysis of its dimensions and characteristics have not been thoroughly described. This study seeks to define the dimensions, common constriction points, and any alternative trajectories that would maximize the corridor diameter.

METHODS:

Computed tomography of 100 male and 100 female hemipelves without osseous trauma were evaluated. The corridor boundaries were determined through manual best-fit analysis. The largest intercortical cylinder within the pathway was created and measured. Alternative trajectories were tested within the SA boundaries to identify another orientation that maximized the diameter of the intercortical cylinder.

RESULTS:

The traditional SA corridor had a mean diameter of 8.3 mm in men and 6.2 mm in women. This difference in diameter is due to a more S-shaped ilium in women. A larger alternative SA corridor was found that had a less limited path through the ilium and measured 11.3 mm in men and 9.9 mm in women. These dimensions are significantly different compared to those of the traditional SA corridor in both men and women.

CONCLUSIONS:

In men, the SA corridor allows for the safe passage of most hardware used in pelvic and acetabular fractures. However, in women, the SA corridor is restricted by a more S-shaped ilium. An alternative trajectory was found that has a significantly larger mean diameter in both sexes. Ultimately, the trajectory of hardware will be dictated by the clinical scenario. When large implants are needed, especially in women, we recommend considering the alternative SA corridor.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral / Fraturas Ósseas Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral / Fraturas Ósseas Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos