Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Novel Minimal Radiation Approach for Percutaneous Pulmonary Valve Implantation.
Zablah, Jenny E; Rodriguez, Salvador A; Leahy, Ryan; Morgan, Gareth J.
Afiliação
  • Zablah JE; The Heart Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, 13123 East 16th Avenue, Box 100, Aurora, CO, USA. Jenny.zablah@childrenscolorado.org.
  • Rodriguez SA; School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA. Jenny.zablah@childrenscolorado.org.
  • Leahy R; The Heart Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, 13123 East 16th Avenue, Box 100, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Morgan GJ; School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 42(4): 926-933, 2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33590323
The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of multimodality imaging technology during percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI). Among percutaneous procedures, PPVI traditionally has one of the highest patient radiation exposures. Different protocol modifications have been implemented to address this problem (i.e., improvements in guidance systems, delivery systems, valve design, post-implantation evaluation). Although the effectiveness of individual modifications has been proven, the effect of an approach which combines these changes has not been reported. We performed a retrospective chart review of 76 patients who underwent PPVI between January 2018 and December 2019. Patients were classified in "Traditional protocol," using routine biplane angiography and/or 3D rotational angiography (3DRA); and "Multimodality protocol" that included the use of VesselNavigator for guidance, selective 3DRA for coronary evaluation, Long DrySeal Sheath for valve delivery, and Intracardiac Echocardiography for valve evaluation after implantation. Radiation metrics, procedural time, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. When the traditional protocol group was compared with the multimodality protocol group, a significant reduction was described for total fluoroscopy time (31.6 min vs. 26.2 min), dose of contrast per kilogram (1.8 mL/Kg vs. 0.9 mL/Kg), DAP/kg (26.6 µGy·m2/kg vs. 19.9 µGy·m2/kg), and Air Kerma (194 mGy vs. 99.9 mGy). A reduction for procedure time was noted (140 min vs. 116.5 min), but this was not statistically significant. There was no difference in clinical outcomes or the presence of complications between groups. The combination of novel technology in PPVI caused a significant reduction in radiation metrics without increasing the complication rate in our population.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Pulmonar / Exposição à Radiação / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Cardiopatias Congênitas Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Pulmonar / Exposição à Radiação / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Cardiopatias Congênitas Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos