Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intrauterine contraction parameters at baseline and following epidural and combined spinal-epidural analgesia: A repeated measures comparison.
Benfield, Rebecca; Song, Huaxin; Salstrom, Jan; Edge, Melydia; Brigham, Denise; Newton, Edward R.
Afiliação
  • Benfield R; School of Nursing, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA. Electronic address: rebecca.benfield@unlv.edu.
  • Song H; School of Nursing, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA; School of Nursing, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
  • Salstrom J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
  • Edge M; Department of Advanced Nursing Practice and Education, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
  • Brigham D; Department of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
  • Newton ER; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Midwifery ; 95: 102943, 2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33596500
OBJECTIVE: The effects of epidural and combined spinal-epidural analgesia on uterine contraction parameters are unclear, although as many as 80% of laboring women use neuraxial analgesia. We explored the effects of epidural and combined spinal-epidural analgesia on all uterine contraction parameters using a retrospective analysis of selected parturients, who required Intrauterine Pressure Catheter (IUPC) instrumentation for clinical management. Additionally, we analyzed the effects of parity, Pitocin dose, and mode of neuraxial anesthesia, i.e. epidural verses combined spinal-epidural on uterine contractility. DESIGN: Using a retrospective within and between repeated measure design we compared uterine contraction parameters at 4 time points (epochs): (1) baseline, (2) pre-epidural fluid bolus, (3) immediate and (4) secondary post-epidural/combined spinal-epidural analgesia to detect differences in contractility over time comparing two types of epidural interventions. METHODS: Eighteen healthy parturients at term gestation were admitted to the labor unit for induction, augmentation, or spontaneous labor. Contraction parameters including frequency, duration, peak intensity, resting intensity and duration, and Montevideo Units (MVUs) were collected using fetal monitor strip data with intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC) instrumentation. FINDINGS: Parametric and non-parametric tests showed no significant differences within or between the two Epidural intervention groups for frequency, duration, peak intensity, resting intensity and duration, and MVUs at all epochs at the .05 alpha level. Compared with Nulliparous women, multiparous women had significantly lower contraction intensity and longer contraction duration. Based on multilevel modeling (MLM), neither Pitocin dose nor type of epidural intervention revealed significant differences on any contraction parameters. CONCLUSIONS: When parity, other demographic variables and Pitocin dose were statistically controlled, no uterine contraction parameter changed from baseline through 90 min following either epidural or combined spinal-epidural analgesia. Obstetrical care providers should consider the preciseness their contraction monitoring instrumentation and their clinical management preferences as well parity as before prescribing Pitocin after neuraxial analgesia intervention.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Trabalho de Parto / Analgesia Epidural / Analgesia Obstétrica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Midwifery Assunto da revista: ENFERMAGEM / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Trabalho de Parto / Analgesia Epidural / Analgesia Obstétrica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Midwifery Assunto da revista: ENFERMAGEM / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido