Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up.
Caplin, David A; Calobrace, M Bradley; Wixtrom, Roger N; Estes, Megan M; Canady, John W.
Afiliação
  • Caplin DA; From Parkcrest Plastic Surgery and Clinical Faculty, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University; private practice and Clinical Faculty, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville and University of Kentucky; LSCI; and Mentor Worldwide,
  • Calobrace MB; From Parkcrest Plastic Surgery and Clinical Faculty, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University; private practice and Clinical Faculty, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville and University of Kentucky; LSCI; and Mentor Worldwide,
  • Wixtrom RN; From Parkcrest Plastic Surgery and Clinical Faculty, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University; private practice and Clinical Faculty, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville and University of Kentucky; LSCI; and Mentor Worldwide,
  • Estes MM; From Parkcrest Plastic Surgery and Clinical Faculty, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University; private practice and Clinical Faculty, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville and University of Kentucky; LSCI; and Mentor Worldwide,
  • Canady JW; From Parkcrest Plastic Surgery and Clinical Faculty, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University; private practice and Clinical Faculty, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville and University of Kentucky; LSCI; and Mentor Worldwide,
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 147(3): 556-566, 2021 03 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33620918
BACKGROUND: Mentor MemoryGel Breast Implants were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in November of 2006. Patients in the Core clinical study supporting this approval were followed for 10 years. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, clinical study included primary augmentation, revision augmentation, primary reconstruction, and revision reconstruction patients implanted with smooth or Siltex Texture MemoryGel Implants. Incidence, severity, and method of resolution for all postoperative complications were assessed on per-patient and per-implant bases. The primary effectiveness endpoints were overall mean change in chest circumference and bra cup size following the implantation procedure. RESULTS: Primary augmentation (n = 552), revision augmentation (n = 145), primary reconstruction (n = 251), and revision reconstruction (n = 60) patients were enrolled in the study. Kaplan-Meier estimated 10-year cumulative incidence rates for key complications at the subject level for Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture were as follows: primary augmentation, 12.1 percent; revision augmentation, 24.4 percent; primary reconstruction, 20.5 percent; and revision reconstruction, 36.9 percent. For infection, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 1.6 percent; revision augmentation, 1.4 percent; primary reconstruction, 6.2 percent; and revision reconstruction, 0 percent. For explantation with or without replacement, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 11.6 percent; revision augmentation, 24.1 percent; primary reconstruction, 33.4 percent; and revision reconstruction; 37.8 percent. For rupture, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 24.2 percent; revision augmentation, 23.7 percent; primary reconstruction, 32.7 percent; and revision reconstruction, 38.7 percent. For any reoperation, rates were as follows: primary augmentation, 25.5 percent; revision augmentation, 43.6 percent; primary reconstruction, 49.0 percent; and revision reconstruction, 50.7 percent. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that MemoryGel Implants are safe and effective for use in women undergoing breast augmentation or reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Reoperação / Falha de Prótese / Implantes de Mama / Implante Mamário / Segurança do Paciente Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Reoperação / Falha de Prótese / Implantes de Mama / Implante Mamário / Segurança do Paciente Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos