Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Complementary and integrative medicine: An observational study on pediatric clinicians' knowledge, beliefs and practices.
Casbarro, Nicole; Ezomo, Olohirere; Woolley, Katherine; Smith, Ryan; Hardin, Claire; Feinn, Richard; Myrick, Karen.
Afiliação
  • Casbarro N; Community Health Center, University of Connecticut, Connecticut, USA.
  • Ezomo O; Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, United States. Electronic address: Olohirere.ezomo@quinnipiac.edu.
  • Woolley K; Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, United States.
  • Smith R; Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, United States.
  • Hardin C; Colorado Children's Hospital, Pediatric Emergency Department, United States.
  • Feinn R; Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, United States.
  • Myrick K; Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, United States; University of Saint Joseph, Connecticut, School of Interdisciplinary Health and Science, United States.
Complement Ther Med ; 58: 102693, 2021 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33652091
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Complementary and Integrative Medicine (CIM) is a group of diverse health care therapies that often serve as adjuncts to conventional medical treatments. Our aim for this study was to evaluate the current knowledge, beliefs and practices of pediatric clinicians regarding CIM.

METHODS:

Clinicians from the pediatric unit of a large US based teaching hospital in Connecticut were surveyed, through self-administered questionnaires.

RESULTS:

We sampled 70 participants with a response rate of 99 %. Of the 70, 32 were Registered Nurses, 9 were Attendings, 7 were Fellows, 15 were Residents and 4 were Nurse Practitioners. Regarding use, 24 % had referred a patient to a CIM practitioner, 43 % reported using CIM while 47 % had a family member who had used CIM in the past year. Respondents were most familiar with massage (70 %) and yoga (69 %) least familiar with Ayurvedic medicine (20 %) and Qi Gong (24 %). Regarding attitude, 67 % believed that some CIM therapies hold promise for the treatment of symptoms while 59 % believed that incorporation of CIM would increase patient satisfaction. Most of the respondents indicated that they did not have easy access to clinical information on many CIM treatment modalities. Nurses were more familiar (p = 0.024), had more positive attitudes and beliefs (p = 0.001) and thought CIM therapies had a higher impact (p = 0.002) on patient care compared to physicians, even when controlled for gender.

CONCLUSION:

This study highlights the need to bridge the gap in evidence based medicine and clinician's knowledge with the rise in CIM use. It also stresses the need for standardized learning competencies in the field of PIM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Terapias Complementares / Medicina Integrativa Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Complement Ther Med Assunto da revista: TERAPIAS COMPLEMENTARES Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Médicos / Terapias Complementares / Medicina Integrativa Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Complement Ther Med Assunto da revista: TERAPIAS COMPLEMENTARES Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos