Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of corrected Cerenkov emission during electron radiotherapy by Monte Carlo method.
Li, Yi; Liu, Hongjun; Huang, Nan; Wang, Zhaolu; Zhang, Chunmin.
Afiliação
  • Li Y; State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, 710119, China; School of Physics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China; University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, 100084, China.
  • Liu H; State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, 710119, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, 030006, China. Electronic address: liuhongjun@opt.ac.cn.
  • Huang N; State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, 710119, China.
  • Wang Z; State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics, Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, 710119, China.
  • Zhang C; School of Physics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China. Electronic address: zcm@xjtu.edu.cn.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 168: 109481, 2021 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33658131
ABSTRACT
Cerenkov emission during electron radiotherapy had been emerging as a new dose assessment approach for clinical radiotherapy and could be imaged through a standard commercial camera. The purpose of this work aimed to study the accuracy of corrected Cerenkov emission method during electron radiotherapy by Monte Carlo (MC) method. GAMOS MC software was used to model the physics of electron therapy and calculated dose and Cerenkov photon distribution in water phantom. Compared to ionization chamber and diode measurement, MC simulated dose discrepancy was less than 1% in percentage depth dose (PDD) curves and less than. 2% in crossline profile curves, which was acceptable for clinical criterion. Compared to ionization chamber dose measurement, MC simulated Cerenkov discrepancy was less than 2% in crossline profile distribution, which was acceptable for clinical criterion. However, the Cerenkov PDD curves tended to overestimate the dose at the build-up region and underestimate the dose at the remaining attenuation region. After increasing the Cerenkov distribution depth to 2-3 mm, the discrepancy became well within 1% at the remaining attenuation region, which was acceptable for clinical criterion. Therefore, corrected Cerenkov emission could be used to assess PDD accuracy and crossline profile accuracy during electron radiotherapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia / Método de Monte Carlo Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Appl Radiat Isot Assunto da revista: MEDICINA NUCLEAR / SAUDE AMBIENTAL Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia / Método de Monte Carlo Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Appl Radiat Isot Assunto da revista: MEDICINA NUCLEAR / SAUDE AMBIENTAL Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China