Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of a pocket compression device on hematomas, skin reactions, and comfort in patients receiving a cardiovascular implantable electronic device: a randomized controlled trial.
Hu, Jingwen; Zheng, Jie; Liu, Xiaoxue; Li, Guoliang; Xiao, Xianghua.
Afiliação
  • Hu J; Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
  • Zheng J; Clinical Research Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
  • Liu X; Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
  • Li G; Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
  • Xiao X; Shaanxi Eye Institute, Xi'an City First Hospital, Xi'an, China. xianghuaxiao@yeah.net.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 63(2): 275-281, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33675448
ABSTRACT
AIM/

OBJECTIVE:

Aim to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a pocket compression device in patients undergoing cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

This randomized controlled trial included 54 patients in the control group (elastic adhesive tape) and 54 patients in the experimental group (pocket compression device). A sandbag was positioned over the pocket after CIED implantation, using elastic adhesive tape in the control group and a novel pocket compression device in the experimental group. The primary outcome was the incidence of pocket hematomas, and the secondary outcomes were adverse skin reactions, the need for sandbag positional adjustments, and patient comfort.

RESULTS:

The distributions of age, sex, and clinical and procedure characteristics was not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). The occurrence of hematomas was lower when using the pocket compression device than in the control group (13.0% vs. 44.4%, P<0.001). The incidence rates of hematomas of grades 1 and the grade 2 hematomas were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (13.0% vs. 31.5%, 0% vs. 11.1% respectively, [all P<0.05]). The incidence rates of adverse skin reactions and sandbag positional adjustments were much lower and the patient comfort score was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (all P<0.001).

CONCLUSION:

A pocket compression device can significantly decrease the incidence of pocket hematomas, adverse skin reactions, and positional adjustments when patients are undergoing CIED, which can improve patient comfort and decrease the nursing workload. CLINICALTRIALS GOV NCT04389398.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Desfibriladores Implantáveis Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Marca-Passo Artificial / Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese / Desfibriladores Implantáveis Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China