Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The (un)necessity of regular postoperative follow-up of hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.
Schmitz, Peter P; van Leent, Eelco A P; de Jong, Lex D; van Susante, Job L C; Somford, Matthijs P.
Afiliação
  • Schmitz PP; Rijnstate Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Arnhem, The Netherlands.. Electronic address: PSchmitz@rijnstate.nl.
  • van Leent EAP; Rijnstate Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Arnhem, The Netherlands.. Electronic address: EvanLeent@Rijnstate.nl.
  • de Jong LD; Rijnstate Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
  • van Susante JLC; Rijnstate Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Arnhem, The Netherlands.. Electronic address: JvanSusante@rijnstate.nl.
  • Somford MP; Rijnstate Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Arnhem, The Netherlands.. Electronic address: MSomford@Rijnstate.nl.
Injury ; 52(10): 2997-3001, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33750587
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Postoperative follow-up after hemiarthroplasty is part of routine based practice. However, these visits appear to be a significant burden since it concerns a frail population. The aim of this study was to confirm the current common practice regarding postoperative visits of patients treated with hemiarthroplasty and to evaluate the complication detection rate at these visits.

METHODS:

A national short survey was conducted among orthopedic surgeons working in 26 large Dutch teaching hospitals to test the hypothesis that postoperative follow-up is indeed common practice. Furthermore, a retrospective patient review was performed in all hemiarthroplasties implanted between January 2014 and December 2019.

RESULTS:

The response of the national survey was complete and showed that postoperative follow-up in patients treated with hemiarthroplasty is part of standard care according to 89% of respondents. A total of 1055 hips (1026 patients) were implanted with hemiarthroplasty during the studied period. Implant-related complications were identified in 68 hemiarthroplasties, with 31 of these hips going on to reoperation. Only 2 of these complications were picked up at standard planned follow-up leading to a complication detection rate of 0.3%. In contrast, complication detection rates of 47% and 16% were found at unplanned visits at the Emergency Department and the outpatient department, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Postoperative follow-up in patients treated with hemiarthroplasty is still the standard of care. However, this study revealed that the majority of implant-related complications are detected at unplanned visits and almost no at standard follow-up visits. Postoperative follow-up of patients treated with hemiarthroplasty could be abandoned in this frail population.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Fraturas do Colo Femoral / Hemiartroplastia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Injury Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia de Quadril / Fraturas do Colo Femoral / Hemiartroplastia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Injury Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article