Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Considerations for using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to assess cognitive flexibility.
Miles, Stephanie; Howlett, Caitlin A; Berryman, Carolyn; Nedeljkovic, Maja; Moseley, G Lorimer; Phillipou, Andrea.
Afiliação
  • Miles S; Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia. smiles@swin.edu.au.
  • Howlett CA; Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Berryman C; Brain Stimulation, Imaging and Cognition Research Group, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Nedeljkovic M; Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
  • Moseley GL; Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Phillipou A; Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia.
Behav Res Methods ; 53(5): 2083-2091, 2021 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33754321
ABSTRACT
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is a popular neurocognitive task used to assess cognitive flexibility, and aspects of executive functioning more broadly, in research and clinical practice. Despite its widespread use and the development of an updated WCST manual in 1993, confusion remains in the literature about how to score the WCST, and importantly, how to interpret the outcome variables as indicators of cognitive flexibility. This critical review provides an overview of the changes in the WCST, how existing scoring methods of the task differ, the key terminology and how these relate to the assessment of cognitive flexibility, and issues with the use of the WCST across the literature. In particular, this review focuses on the confusion between the terms 'perseverative responses' and 'perseverative errors' and the inconsistent scoring of these variables. To our knowledge, this critical review is the first of its kind to focus on the inherent issues surrounding the WCST when used as an assessment of cognitive flexibility. We provide recommendations to overcome these and other issues when using the WCST in future research and clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Função Executiva / Teste de Classificação de Cartas de Wisconsin Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Behav Res Methods Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DO COMPORTAMENTO Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália País de publicação: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Função Executiva / Teste de Classificação de Cartas de Wisconsin Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Behav Res Methods Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DO COMPORTAMENTO Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália País de publicação: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA