Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost utility analysis of intramedullary nailing and skeletal traction treatment for patients with femoral shaft fractures in Malawi.
Chokotho, Linda; Donnelley, Claire A; Young, Sven; Lau, Brian C; Wu, Hao-Hua; Mkandawire, Nyengo; Gjertsen, Jan-Erik; Hallan, Geir; Agarwal-Harding, Kiran J; Shearer, David.
Afiliação
  • Chokotho L; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Malawi.
  • Donnelley CA; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Young S; Institute for Global Orthopedics and Traumatology, Orthopedic Trauma Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Lau BC; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Malawi.
  • Wu HH; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  • Mkandawire N; Department of Surgery, Kamuzu Central Hospital, Lilongwe, Malawi.
  • Gjertsen JE; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Hallan G; Institute for Global Orthopedics and Traumatology, Orthopedic Trauma Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Agarwal-Harding KJ; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Malawi.
  • Shearer D; School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Acta Orthop ; 92(4): 436-442, 2021 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33757393
ABSTRACT
Background and purpose - In Malawi, both skeletal traction (ST) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are used in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures, ST being the mainstay treatment. Previous studies have found that IMN has improved outcomes and is less expensive than ST. However, no cost-effectiveness analyses have yet compared IMN and ST in Malawi. We report the results of a cost-utility analysis (CUA) comparing treatment using either IMN or ST.Patients and methods - This was an economic evaluation study, where a CUA was done using a decision-tree model from the government healthcare payer and societal perspectives with an 1-year time horizon. We obtained EQ-5D-3L utility scores and probabilities from a prospective observational study assessing quality of life and function in 187 adult patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with either IMN or ST. The patients were followed up at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-injury. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated from utility scores using the area under the curve method. Direct treatment costs were obtained from a prospective micro costing study. Indirect costs included patient lost productivity, patient transportation, meals, and childcare costs associated with hospital stay and follow-up visits. Multiple sensitivity analyses assessed model uncertainty.Results - Total treatment costs were higher for ST ($1,349) compared with IMN ($1,122). QALYs were lower for ST than IMN, 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.76) and 0.77 (CI 0.71-0.82) respectively. Based on lower cost and higher utility, IMN was the dominant strategy. IMN remained dominant in 94% of simulations. IMN would be less cost-effective than ST at a total procedure cost exceeding $880 from the payer's perspective, or $1,035 from the societal perspective.Interpretation - IMN was cost saving and more effective than ST in the treatment of adult femoral shaft fractures in Malawi, and may be an efficient use of limited healthcare resources.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tração / Fraturas do Fêmur / Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Acta Orthop Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tração / Fraturas do Fêmur / Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Humans País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Acta Orthop Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article