Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Standardization of microbiome studies for urolithiasis: an international consensus agreement.
Kachroo, Naveen; Lange, Dirk; Penniston, Kristina L; Stern, Joshua; Tasian, Gregory; Bajic, Petar; Wolfe, Alan J; Suryavanshi, Mangesh; Ticinesi, Andrea; Meschi, Tiziana; Monga, Manoj; Miller, Aaron W.
Afiliação
  • Kachroo N; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Lange D; The Stone Centre at VGH, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Colombia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Penniston KL; Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Stern J; Department of Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
  • Tasian G; Division of Urology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Bajic P; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Wolfe AJ; Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA.
  • Suryavanshi M; Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya University, Mangalore, India.
  • Ticinesi A; Geriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Meschi T; Department of Medicine and Surgery, Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.
  • Monga M; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Miller AW; Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Nat Rev Urol ; 18(5): 303-311, 2021 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33782583
ABSTRACT
Numerous metagenome-wide association studies (MWAS) for urolithiasis have been published, leading to the discovery of potential interactions between the microbiome and urolithiasis. However, questions remain about the reproducibility, applicability and physiological relevance of these data owing to discrepancies in experimental technique and a lack of standardization in the field. One barrier to interpreting MWAS is that experimental biases can be introduced at every step of the experimental pipeline, including sample collection, preservation, storage, processing, sequencing, data analysis and validation. Thus, the introduction of standardized protocols that maintain the flexibility to achieve study-specific objectives is urgently required. To address this need, the first international consortium for microbiome in urinary stone disease - MICROCOSM - was created and consensus panel members were asked to participate in a consensus meeting to develop standardized protocols for microbiome studies if they had published an MWAS on urolithiasis. Study-specific protocols were revised until a consensus was reached. This consensus group generated standardized protocols, which are publicly available via a secure online server, for each step in the typical clinical microbiome-urolithiasis study pipeline. This standardization creates the benchmark for future studies to facilitate consistent interpretation of results and, collectively, to lead to effective interventions to prevent the onset of urolithiasis, and will also be useful for investigators interested in microbiome research in other urological diseases.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas Microbiológicas / Urolitíase / Microbiota Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nat Rev Urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas Microbiológicas / Urolitíase / Microbiota Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nat Rev Urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
...