Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Periodontitis Prevalence, Severity, and Risk Factors: A Comparison of the AAP/CDC Case Definition and the EFP/AAP Classification.
Germen, Meliha; Baser, Ulku; Lacin, Cagdas Caglar; Firatli, Erhan; Issever, Halim; Yalcin, Funda.
Afiliação
  • Germen M; Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, 34134 Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Baser U; Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, 34134 Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Lacin CC; Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, 34134 Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Firatli E; Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, 34134 Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Issever H; Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medical, University of Istanbul, 34104 Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Yalcin F; Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Istanbul, 34134 Istanbul, Turkey.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33810461
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This cross-sectional study evaluated the utility of the 2018 European Federation of Periodontology/American Academy of Periodontology (EFP/AAP) classifications of epidemiological studies in terms of periodontitis severity, prevalence and associated risk factors and the 2012 American Academy of Periodontology/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (AAP/CDC) case definitions.

METHODS:

We included 488 participants aged 35-74 years. Measurements were recorded at six sites per tooth by two qualified examiners. The evaluated parameters included pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Periodontitis prevalence and severity were reported using the 2018 EFP/AAP classification and the AAP/CDC case definitions. The data were stratified by recognized risk factors (age, diabetes and smoking status).

RESULTS:

The 2018 EFP/AAP classification indicated that all patients suffered from periodontitis. When CAL served as the main criterion, the frequency of patients with severe (Stages III-IV) periodontitis was 54%. When the AAP/CDC case definitions were applied, the prevalence of periodontitis was 61.9% and that of severe periodontitis 16.8%. Age was the most significant risk factor, regardless of the chosen case definition.

CONCLUSION:

It is essential to employ a globalized standard case definition when monitoring periodontitis and associated risk factors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Periodontite / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Periodontite / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia