Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Autologous connective tissue graft or xenogenic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flaps for coverage of multiple adjacent gingival recession. 36-month follow-up of a randomized multicentre trial.
Tonetti, Maurizio S; Cortellini, Pierpaolo; Bonaccini, Daniele; Deng, Ke; Cairo, Francesco; Allegri, Mario; Conforti, Gianpaolo; Graziani, Filippo; Guerrero, Adrian; Halben, Jan; Malet, Jacques; Rasperini, Giulio; Topoll, Heinz.
Afiliação
  • Tonetti MS; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Centre for Stomatology, Shanghai Ninth People Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
  • Cortellini P; European Research Group on Periodontology, Genova, Italy.
  • Bonaccini D; European Research Group on Periodontology, Genova, Italy.
  • Deng K; European Research Group on Periodontology, Genova, Italy.
  • Cairo F; Division of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, China.
  • Allegri M; European Research Group on Periodontology, Genova, Italy.
  • Conforti G; Unit of Periodontology, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Graziani F; European Research Group on Periodontology, Genova, Italy.
  • Guerrero A; European Research Group on Periodontology, Genova, Italy.
  • Halben J; European Research Group on Periodontology, Genova, Italy.
  • Malet J; Department of Periodontology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
  • Rasperini G; European Research Group on Periodontology, Genova, Italy.
  • Topoll H; European Research Group on Periodontology, Genova, Italy.
J Clin Periodontol ; 48(7): 962-969, 2021 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33817812
AIM: To report the 36-month follow-up of a trial comparing the adjunct of a xenogenic collagen matrix (CMX) or connective tissue graft (CTG) to coronally advanced flaps (CAF) for coverage of multiple adjacent recessions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 125 subjects (61 CMX) with 307 recessions in 8 centres from the parent trial were followed-up for 36 months. Primary outcome was change in position of the gingival margin. Multilevel analysis used centre, subject and tooth as levels and baseline parameters as covariates. RESULTS: No differences were observed between the randomized and the follow-up population. Average baseline recession was 2.6 ± 1.0 mm. 3-year root coverage was 1.5 ± 1.5 mm for CMX and 2.0 ± 1.0 mm for CTG (difference of 0.32 mm, 95% CI from -0.02 to 0.65 mm). The upper limit of the confidence interval was over the non-inferiority margin of 0.25 mm. No treatment differences in position of the gingival margin were observed between 6- and 36-month follow-up (difference 0.06 mm, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.29 mm). CONCLUSION: CMX was not non-inferior with respect to CTG in multiple adjacent recessions. No differences in stability of root coverage were observed between groups and in changes from 6 to 36 months. Previously reported shorter time to recovery, lower morbidity and more natural appearance of tissue texture and contour observed for CMX in this trial are also relevant in clinical decision-making.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retração Gengival Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Periodontol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retração Gengival Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Periodontol Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China País de publicação: Estados Unidos