Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
British Rhinological Society Consensus Guidance on the use of biological therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
Hopkins, Claire; McKenzie, Jo-Lyn; Anari, Shahram; Carrie, Sean; Ramakrishnan, Yujay; Kara, Naveed; Philpott, Carl; Hobson, Jonathan; Qureishi, Ali; Stew, Ben; Bhalla, Raj; Gane, Simon; Walker, Abigail; Harries, Phil; Hathorn, Iain; Lund, Valerie.
Afiliação
  • Hopkins C; Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK.
  • McKenzie JL; Guy's and Hospitals, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
  • Anari S; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Carrie S; Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Ramakrishnan Y; Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK.
  • Kara N; County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK.
  • Philpott C; Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • Hobson J; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Qureishi A; Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
  • Stew B; University Hospital Wales, Cardiff, UK.
  • Bhalla R; Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Gane S; The Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK.
  • Walker A; Rhinology Fellow St George's Hospital, London, UK.
  • Harries P; University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
  • Hathorn I; University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Lund V; Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, UCLH Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 46(5): 1037-1043, 2021 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33817954
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We set out to create Consensus Guidelines, based on current evidence and relative risks of adverse effects and the costs of different treatments, which reflect the views of the British Rhinological Society (BRS) Council on where the use of biologics should be positioned within treatment pathways for CRSwNP, specifically in the setting of the National Health Service (NHS).

DESIGN:

An expert panel of 16 members was assembled. A review of the literature and evidence synthesis was undertaken and circulated to the panel. We used the RAND/UCLA methodology with a multi-step process to make recommendations on the use of biologics.

SETTING:

N/A.

PARTICIPANTS:

N/A.

RESULTS:

Recommendations were made, based on underlying disease severity, prior treatments and co-morbidities. A group of patients for whom biologics were considered an appropriate treatment option for CRSwNP was defined.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although biologics are not currently available for the treatment of CRSwNP, the BRS Council have defined a group of patients who have higher rates of "failure" with current treatment pathways, higher resource use and are more likely to suffer with uncontrolled symptoms. We would urge NICE to consider approval of biologics for such indications without applying further restrictions on use.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sinusite / Produtos Biológicos / Terapia Biológica / Rinite / Pólipos Nasais Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Clin Otolaryngol Assunto da revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sinusite / Produtos Biológicos / Terapia Biológica / Rinite / Pólipos Nasais Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Clin Otolaryngol Assunto da revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido